Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8558540

Differences between death and dying.

Abstract

With so much attention being paid to the development and refinement of appropriate criteria and tests for death, little attention has been given to the broader conceptual issues having to do with its definition or with the relation of a definition to its criterion. The task of selecting the correct criterion is, however, virtually impossible without proper attention to the broader conceptual setting in which the definition operates as the key feature. All of the issues I will discuss arise because of this lack of concern with conceptual matters. Such problems as incorrectly diagnosing a patient as dead prior to the harvesting of his or her organs, defending the idea that death is reversible, and advocating a brainstem criterion of death, are all, I believe, errors that derive from this misplaced emphasis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E T Bartlett. 1995. Differences between death and dying.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.21.5.270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The accuracy of hospital reports of organ donation eligibility, requests, and consent: a cross-validation study.

BACKGROUND: Many states require hospitals to complete a form for each patient who dies, reporting the patient's organ and tissue donation eligibility status, whether a request was made, and the outcome of the request. A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of state-required forms in documenting organ eligibility and procurement activities. METHODS: Four Level 1 trauma hospitals in northeast Ohio were sampled by using a weekly review of all deaths. Detailed chart reviews were conducted on a total of 2,270 deaths occurring during a six-month period in 1997, interviews with health care providers and staff members at organ procurement organizations were held, and records of the local Ohio Department of Health (ODH) were reviewed. Agreement between these data sources and the ODH form were compared to evaluate whether the ODH form correctly documented patients' eligibility status, occurrence of a donation request, and donation request outcome. Descriptive statistics and sensitivity and specificity analyses were completed. RESULTS: The quality of the information provided through these forms was variable. Problems included missing, inaccurate, and contradictory data. State reporting forms overrepresented the size of the organ donor pool by about four times, and requests for donation and consent to donation were inaccurately reported. Hospital form completion rates ranged from 12% to 82.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Basing the evaluation of hospital or statewide organ procurement performance on summary information provided by these forms would lead to an inaccurate picture of organ procurement activities in the state.

Brain Death