Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8525234

[Why bioethics today?].

Abstract

Only recently medicine has emphasized the importance of major ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, justice and non-malificence) and only recently they have come to play an important role in medical and public policy discussions. Until the 70's, medical dilemmas and disagreements were rarely discussed in terms of rights and duties. However, at this point in history, crucial new ideas were introduced, including the notion of Medical Bioethics. What seems important at this stage is to show if Bioethics has made a significant difference in the field of medicine. This article intends to give a picture of how ethical, historical and medical factors have influenced the beginning of Bioethics, in an attempt to determine how much it has been able to fulfill a genuine need.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Figueroa. 1995. [Why bioethics today?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8525234/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinities to the often criticised empirical slippery slope argument. The hopeful principle is shown to be really hopeless as an argument, and automatic escalator arguments often lead nowhere when critically analysed. These arguments should therefore only be used with great caution.

Bioethics↗