Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8480876

Gallstone lithotripsy.

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been applied to patients with gallstones since the mid-1980s. Lithotriptors differ by their means of shock-wave generation, the mechanisms by which they are coupled to the patient, and their imaging systems. Entry in most treatment protocols is limited to symptomatic patients with one to three radiolucent stones having a diameter of 30 mm or less and a functioning gallbladder according to oral cholecystography. Treatments are given on an out-patient basis using intravenous analgesia and include adjuvant bile acid therapy. Deaths have not been reported, and the incidence of serious complications, related to the presence of fragments in the biliary system, is low. The studies show that ESWL is a safe and effective treatment for patients with a single gallstone less than or equal to 20 mm in diameter, but the efficacy for larger single stones and multiple stones is poor. To date, the Food and Drug Administration has not approved lithotriptors for the treatment of gallstones in the United States.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D L Nahrwold. 1993. Gallstone lithotripsy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80935-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review in the available literature about the safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies, focusing on the selection criteria of the patients, treatment options and follow-up. DESIGN: Literature survey. RESULTS: The incidence of cancer in women who still want to get pregnant is increasing significantly. An early detection in gynecological malignancies allows less aggressive approaches to cure such disorders. A more conservative management, which preserves fertility, is considered safe and an option for those who have not completed their child-bearing. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer may be candidates to a safe fertility-preserving management. A careful stage and follow-up of the patients is essential to achieve success with this practice.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗

Defining optimal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We defined an optimal curative strategy for muscle invasive bladder cancer and to determine how best to deliver curative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed published reports from 1985 to 2006 dealing with the treatment of muscle invasive (stage T2-T4a) bladder cancer. We analyzed all cohort, phase II and randomized phase III studies providing level 1 to 3 evidence impacting survival. RESULTS: Cisplatin based chemotherapy combined with high quality radical cystectomy and complete pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival over that of cystectomy alone. Surgery quality is an important predictor of survival even in patients receiving chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is favored over adjuvant chemotherapy because it is better tolerated and more patients are able to receive effective therapy before rather than after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and complete pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal curative strategy in most patients presenting with muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗