Computer simulation technique for assessing pediatric auditory test protocols.

A M Tharpe; D H Ashmead

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8471789

Computer simulation technique for assessing pediatric auditory test protocols.

A M Tharpe·D H Ashmead

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Adaptive testing procedures are widely used for evaluating the hearing of young children. A standard protocol for such testing, however, has not been recommended and, as a result, many variations of the procedure are used clinically. This study, by utilizing computer simulations, varied several test parameters and examined the resulting test outcomes. We evaluated the effects of starting level, stimulus step size, and the use of conditioning trials on test outcome, while also varying the hearing levels and false positive and and negative rates of our simulated subjects. Results indicated that a low starting level, with a 20-dB down 10-dB up step size, and no conditioning trials produced the most accurate estimates of thresholds under most conditions.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic Stimulation Auditory Threshold Child, Preschool Computers Female Hearing Hearing Disorders Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Male Photic Stimulation Reproducibility of Results Sound Localization Comparative Study Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

A M Tharpe, D H Ashmead. 1993. Computer simulation technique for assessing pediatric auditory test protocols.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8471789/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Calretinin expression in the chick brainstem auditory nuclei develops and is maintained independently of cochlear nerve input.

The expression of the calcium-binding protein calretinin (CR) in the chick brainstem auditory nuclei angularis (NA), laminaris (NL), and magnocelularis (NM) was studied during normal development and after deafening by surgical removal of the otocyst (embryonic precursor of the inner ear) or columella (middle ear ossicle). CR mRNA was localized by in situ hybridization by using a radiolabeled oligonucleotide chick CR probe. CR immunoreactivity (CR-IR) was localized on adjacent tissue sections. CR mRNA signal in the auditory nuclei was expressed at comparable levels at embryonic day (E)9 and E11 and increased thereafter to reach the highest levels in posthatch chicks. CR-IR neurons were apparent in NM and NA at E11 and in NL by E13, and CR-IR increased in all three auditory nuclei thereafter. Neither unilateral nor bilateral otocyst removal caused detectable changes in the intensity of CR mRNA expression or CR-IR in the auditory nuclei at any of the several ages examined. Similarly, columella removal at posthatching day 2 or 3 failed to significantly affect CR mRNA or CR-IR levels at 3 hours, 1 day, or 3-4 days survival times. We conclude that cochlear nerve input is not necessary for expression of either calretinin mRNA or protein and that the profound decrease in sound-evoked activity caused by columella removal does not affect the maintenance of CR expression after hatching.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1997

Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Restrictions to attentional capacity are revealed by the interference that commonly results when two sensory inputs must be identified at the same time. To investigate this phenomenon within and between modalities, we presented streams of visual and/or auditory inputs, containing occasional targets to be identified and recalled. For two visual or two auditory streams, identification of one target produced a sustained reduction in the ability to identify a second, the period of interference lasting for several hundred milliseconds. Subjectively, when attention was assigned to one target it was temporarily unavailable for another. In contrast, there was no such time-locked interference between targets in different modalities. The results suggest a modality-specific restriction to concurrent attention and awareness; visual attention to one simple target does not restrict concurrent auditory attention to another.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1997

A nonrandom dynamic component in the synaptic noise of a central neuron.

Continuous segments of synaptic noise were recorded in vivo from teleost Mauthner cells and were studied with the methods of nonlinear analysis. As in many central neurons, this ongoing activity is dominated by consecutive inhibitory postsynaptic potentials. Recurrence plots and first or third order Poincaré maps combined with surrogate shuffling revealed nonrandom patterns consistent with the notion that synaptic noise is a continuously varying mixture of periodic and chaotic phases. Chaos was further demonstrated by the occurrence of unstable periodic orbits. The nonrandom component of the noise is reproducibly and persistently reduced when the level of background sound, a natural stimulus for networks afferent to the Mauthner cell, is briefly elevated. These data are consistent with a model involving a reciprocally connected inhibitory network, presynaptic to the Mauthner cell and its intrinsic properties. The presence of chaos in the inhibitory synaptic noise that regulates the excitability of the Mauthner cell and its sensitivity to external stimuli suggests that it modulates this neuron's function, namely to trigger a fast escape motor reaction following unexpected sensory information.

Acoustic Stimulation↗