Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8451339

Absolute pitch.

Abstract

Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to identify a tone's pitch or to produce a tone at a particular pitch without the use of an external reference pitch. AP exists in varying degrees among people generally described as AP possessors. AP possessors vary not only in the accuracy with which they can identify pitches but also in their ability to produce pitches absolutely and in their ability to identify tones of various timbers and in various pitch registers. AP possessors' memory for pitches is mediated by verbal pitch names; they do not have superior memory for pitches per se. Although the etiology of AP is not yet completely understood, evidence points toward the early-learning theory. This theory states that AP can be learned by anyone during a limited period early in development, up to about age 6, after which a general developmental shift from perceiving individual features to perceiving relations among features makes AP difficult or impossible to acquire.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Takeuchi, S H Hulse. 1993. Absolute pitch.. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Developing a clinical competency examination in radiology: part II--test results.

BACKGROUND: This is the second of two articles introducing a clinical competency examination in radiology. The first article described the structure, administration, and postexamination student comments for two versions of the radiology competency examination. This article reports the results obtained from these two administrations of the examinations. OBJECTIVE: To measure and identify potential outcome predictors of student aptitude in clinical film interpretation. DESIGN: Experimental. METHODS: An examination was developed to simulate the radiologic interpretive skills needed in clinical chiropractic practice. Two versions of the examination were given to a class of 210 ninth trimester students in a 10-trimester chiropractic program. Linear regression and bivariate correlations were performed on possible predictors of student success and test scores on the version 2 examination. RESULTS: On version 1 of the examination, students were able to identify an average of 59.6% of the normal cases as normal and 51.6% of abnormal cases as abnormal. On version 2, 55.6% of the normal cases were recognized as normal and 58.2% of abnormal cases as abnormal. On both versions, students were less successful at correctly categorizing, managing, or naming pathologic conditions they found. Of the predictors evaluated, only the students' grades in the third radiology course (tumors, arthritides, and extremity trauma) and the scores on the diagnostic imaging section of National Boards part II were significant predictors. DISCUSSION: Our results should cause some concern for educators who use content-based radiology curricula. Students demonstrated poor abilities to recognize, categorize, manage, and identify common radiographic pathologic conditions. Educators cannot rely on National Board scores and course grades to determine student clinical competency. More radiology clinical competency exercises that emphasize film interpretation need to be incorporated into content-based curricula.

Aptitude