PubMed · 8372333
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Weinbaum, L Graves. 1993. Speak up!. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8372333/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and benefits of placing dental undergraduates into a general dental practice setting for part of their clinical programme. SETTING: Two six-surgery general dental practices in the North West of England operating within the personal dental service of the NHS. METHOD: Six volunteer final year students worked within the practices for one-day-per week for 11 weeks. Evaluation included patients', practitioners' and students' views obtained from questionnaires and/or interviews and an analysis of students' clinical records. RESULTS: The students saw a large positive impact from: working alongside a dental nurse; developing their clinical skills; working in a busy practice environment; and developing interpersonal skills. Patients were very positive with 98% (44/45) being complimentary about the treatment they received, and commenting that they would be willing to participate in future student training programmes. The practice principals would also welcome continuation of the programme. CONCLUSION: The programme was both feasible and educationally beneficial. The financial implications need further research.
OBJECTIVE: To find out the knowledge of, and attitudes towards, water fluoridation of a sample of general dental practitioners working in the North East of England. DESIGN: Anonymous, self-completed postal questionnaire. SETTING: North East of England, both a fluoridated and non-fluoridated area. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Following a small pilot survey, questionnaire to 79 general dental practitioners (44 in a non-fluoridated area, 35 in an area supplied with fluoridated water at one part per million) contracted to provide National Health Service (NHS) treatment in the North East of England. RESULTS: Fifty-five general dental practitioners returned questionnaires (a 70% response rate). Most respondents supported the principle of water fluoridation. Over half of the respondents indicated that they would benefit from more information and training on the issue of water fluoridation. There were marked differences in knowledge and attitudes to fluoridation between dental principals and associates. The sample was evenly split about what to do with a parent who was unsure about (whether to support) fluoridation even after the dentist had discussed the issue and answered questions. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of general dental practitioners support water fluoridation although some lack knowledge and expertise which might inhibit advocacy of it.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes of Israeli intensive care physicians regarding intensive care unit (ICU) triage issues. DESIGN: An opinion survey using questionnaires similar to those used in a previous study in the United States. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three physicians, members of the Israel Society of Critical Care Medicine (45%). RESULTS: Important factors for admission to the last ICU bed were: small likelihood of surviving hospitalization, irreversibility of acute disorder, nature of chronic disorders and the physician's personal attitude. Most respondents would admit a patient with a predicted survival of a few weeks (70%) or a patient whose quality of life would be poor according to the physician's (98%) or patient's (77%) definition, to the last ICU bed. The personal attitude of the respondents and their own view of the patient's quality of life were considered as important as the quality of life as viewed by the patient. Israeli physicians tended to refuse patient admission into the ICU more than their US counterparts. Most Israeli physicians refused to discharge an ICU patient in order to admit another, despite bed shortage. CONCLUSIONS: The attitudes of Israeli intensive care physicians towards distribution of ICU resources differ from those of their United States counterparts; they are more paternalistic and comply less with requests for admission. Such attitudes are comparable to those expressed by some European intensive care physicians, highlighting the existence of diversity in the factors important to physicians' decision-making.