Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8362575

Processing fine needle aspiration biopsies for electron microscopic examination. Experience implementing a procedure.

Abstract

While processing needle rinses from fine needle aspiration biopsy material for electron microscopy, we experienced difficulties not fully outlined previously. Problems in preservation were traced to the time elapsed before glutaraldehyde was added to the needle rinse, which had been held in a physiologic transport medium; a tendency toward hypotonicity of the commercially prepared transport medium; and vigorous handling of the needle rinse. When these problems were dealt with, preservation improved dramatically. The problem of scanty material available for ultrastructural evaluation was dealt with by decreasing the number of smears made and filtering the needle rinse to capture tissue fragments. Implementation of the procedure required leadership, good communication, motivated cytotechnologists and cytopathologists, and continuous supervision and monitoring. In cases with adequately cellular well-preserved material available for electron microscopy, ultrastructural evaluation made a contribution of clinical value to the diagnosis in 48% of cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Ravinsky, G E Quinonez, M Paraskevas, M S Diocee, E M Kutryk. Processing fine needle aspiration biopsies for electron microscopic examination. Experience implementing a procedure.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8362575/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗