Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8359820

Multipoint mapping under genetic interference.

Abstract

Genetic chiasma interference occurs when one crossover influences the probability of another crossover occurring nearby. While interference is known to occur in humans, it is typically ignored when computing multipoint likelihoods for genetic mapping. This biologically unsound assumption of no interference facilitates the calculation of the likelihoods at the expense of reduced power to accurately construct a genetic map. We have developed a computer program that calculates multipoint likelihoods of three-generation nuclear families while taking interference into account. In our program, interference is modelled by using a map function to convert genetic distances into recombination fractions. We can determine which of several map functions best fits the data by comparing the multipoint likelihoods of the data under each map function. Since the distribution of the difference between likelihoods is unknown, we use a simulation approach to determine the statistical significance of our results. When our program is applied to six loci, D10S34, D10S19, D10S16, D10S14, D10S4, and D10S20, from the CEPH consortium map of chromosome 10, we find significant evidence in favor of positive interference as modelled by the Sturt map function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Weeks, G M Lathrop, J Ott. Multipoint mapping under genetic interference.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000154123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Some results on combinations of two binary screening tests.

When two medical screening tests for a disease exist, it may be appealing to combine them to increase screening accuracy. Combination of two valid screening tests, where each independently has screening performance, can increase the overall disease screening performance. Some results are obtained when two binary screening tests are combined according to the Boolean Any+ strategy, as defined by Maguire (1). These results are useful and provide investigators of two screening tests a sense of what to expect of the performance of the two tests when combined. This then may be followed by a clinical trial that directly demonstrates the benefit of the combined test.

Binomial Distribution

Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data.

Existing methods for setting confidence intervals for the difference theta between binomial proportions based on paired data perform inadequately. The asymptotic method can produce limits outside the range of validity. The 'exact' conditional method can yield an interval which is effectively only one-sided. Both these methods also have poor coverage properties. Better methods are described, based on the profile likelihood obtained by conditionally maximizing the proportion of discordant pairs. A refinement (methods 5 and 6) which aligns 1-alpha with an aggregate of tail areas produces appropriate coverage properties. A computationally simpler method based on the score interval for the single proportion also performs well (method 10).

Binomial Distribution

Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.

Several existing unconditional methods for setting confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions are evaluated. Computationally simpler methods are prone to a variety of aberrations and poor coverage properties. The closely interrelated methods of Mee and Miettinen and Nurminen perform well but require a computer program. Two new approaches which also avoid aberrations are developed and evaluated. A tail area profile likelihood based method produces the best coverage properties, but is difficult to calculate for large denominators. A method combining Wilson score intervals for the two proportions to be compared also performs well, and is readily implemented irrespective of sample size.

Binomial Distribution