Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8347259

Variations associated with disaggregation methods in DNA flow cytometry.

Abstract

We investigated the variations in DNA ploidy by flow cytometry (FC) among cell suspensions acquired by different disaggregation methods from the same tumor specimens. Cell suspensions (n = 121) of 40 solid tumors were obtained by mechanical mincing (n = 33), enzymatic digestion (n = 19), in vitro fine needle aspiration (FNA) (n = 34) or scraping (n = 35) of the tumor tissues. Mechanical disaggregation gave the highest cell yield, whereas enzymatic digestion provided the best cell viability. The mean values for the G0/G1 coefficient of variation, DNA indices and percent S phase were not significantly different in cell suspensions obtained with the four methods. However, the yield of malignant cells ranged from 60.4 +/- 5.3% (SEM) (enzymatic) to 82.3 +/- 3.1% (scraping). Tissue aliquots of 32 tumors were disaggregated by three to four methods, and the combined results of DNA ploidy obtained from different cell preparations showed that 22 tumors were nondiploid, but concordance with an abnormal DNA peak was found in only 27.3% (6/22) of the DNA nondiploid tumors. Our results indicate that scraping tumor tissue appears to be the best method for DNA FC since it has the highest percentage (61.3) of DNA nondiploid clones. Also, we believe the multiple samplings may provide comprehensive information on the DNA ploidy of solid tumors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T K Lee, A L Wiley, J D Esinhart, R S Riley, L D Blackburn. 1993. Variations associated with disaggregation methods in DNA flow cytometry.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8347259/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗