Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8308045

Finger joint force minimization in pianists using optimization techniques.

Abstract

A numerical optimization procedure was used to determine finger positions that minimize and maximize finger tendon and joint force objective functions during piano play. A biomechanical finger model for sagittal plane motion, based on finger anatomy, was used to investigate finger tendon tensions and joint reaction forces for finger positions used in playing the piano. For commonly used piano key strike positions, flexor and intrinsic muscle tendon tensions ranged from 0.7 to 3.2 times the fingertip key strike force, while resultant inter-joint compressive forces ranged from 2 to 7 times the magnitude of the fingertip force. In general, use of a curved finger position, with a large metacarpophalangeal joint flexion angle and a small proximal interphalangeal joint flexion angle, reduces flexor tendon tension and resultant finger joint force.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D C Harding, K D Brandt, B M Hillberry. 1993. Finger joint force minimization in pianists using optimization techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90091-r

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model.

PURPOSE: Experience using distraction osteogenesis for limb lengthening has shown the importance of appliance orientation. Although successful results of mandibular lengthening using osteodistraction have been reported, optimal orientation of the distractors relative to the mandible has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of linear distractors placed parallel to the body of the mandible or parallel to the axis of distraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-dimensional model of the human mandible was generated for computer simulation of mandibular osteodistraction. Linear distractors were then analyzed based on their orientation, either parallel to the body of the mandible or parallel to the axis of distraction. In addition, two types of distraction osteogenesis procedures for mandibular reconstruction were analyzed: 1) bilateral mandibular lengthening, and 2) bilateral mandibular lengthening in combination with midline mandibular widening. RESULTS: Distractors oriented parallel to the body of the mandible caused a lateral displacement of the posterior components of the distraction devices and a reduction of the midline distraction gap during mandibular lengthening. These effects were eliminated when the device was oriented parallel to the axis of distraction. Midline symphyseal widening created axial rotation of the mandibular condyles regardless of the orientation of the distractors. CONCLUSIONS: Distraction appliances must be oriented parallel to the axis of distraction to prevent adverse biomechanical effects during bilateral mandibular lengthening. Additional ramus osteotomies, using hinged devices for angular correction, may be necessary to compensate for rotational movements of the mandibular condyles secondary to midline osteodistraction.

Biomechanical Phenomena

Implant screw mechanics.

Osseointegrated implant support of dental restorations continues to be a popular option for the contemporary patient with missing natural dentition. This article focuses on the two most frequently used methods for attaching final prostheses to endosseous implants. The authors offer practical solutions for minimizing implant screw loosening and describe the factors involved in maintaining stable screw joint assembly.

Biomechanical Phenomena