Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8296282

[A new teaching program in behavioral sciences in Oslo].

Abstract

The Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine at the University of Oslo was established in 1977. The teaching programme followed the same main principles until 1992, and took place in the third and fourth terms. Since 1992, however, several changes have taken place. The teaching is now given together with medical history during ten weeks at the end of the preclinical term. Teaching practical skills in doctor-patient communication is introduced in this term, and is continued in the first clinical year. The students work together in plenary seminars on the main topics presented in the lectures. The teaching is still concentrated on four main topics: Psychobiology, medical psychology, medical sociology and the doctor-patient relationship and communication. We conclude that the changes have improved the teaching. Written evaluation by the students strongly supports this conclusion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Ekeberg, A Finset, A Holte, T Moum, P Vaglum, B Ogar, U Malt. 1994-01-10. [A new teaching program in behavioral sciences in Oslo].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8296282/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Value of high-cost cancer care: a behavioral science perspective.

Concerns about the high costs of cancer care have led to a renewed interest in understanding how patients value the outcomes of care. Psychologists, economists, and others have highlighted some of the ways in which patients and caregivers perceive and make treatment decisions. Prospect theory is the predominant framework for understanding decisions made in situations where the outcomes of each choice are uncertain. Prospect theory assumes that a patient values the outcomes of care not in absolute terms, such as years of life saved, but as deviations from the patient's point of reference. This article discusses some of the implications of this notion, along with discussing differences among people in their reference points. These and other considerations from the psychology of decision making help to clarify why some patients might be inclined to seek expensive or risky treatments in the hopes of achieving benefits that others might consider not worthwhile. An appreciation of these psychological issues might improve the quality of debates concerning the rising costs of cancer care.

Behavioral Sciences↗