Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8295764

Lung scan reporting language: what does it mean?

H W Gray·J H McKillop·R G Bessent
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the understanding of the verbal probability language used for communicating lung scan findings. A questionnaire providing a series of expressions of probability in lung scan reporting was sent to 211 consultant nuclear medicine providers in the UK. Respondents were asked to estimate the probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) communicated by each reporting expression on a visual linear probability scale. Analysis of 135 replies revealed a wide variation in the interpretation of the probability language. We suggest that different training, the nature of the probability scale itself and the difficulties of expressing a verbal report on a numerical scale are major reasons for this finding. We conclude that use of verbal probability language complicates the communication of PE risk and that likelihood ratios provide a logical alternative.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationHumansLanguagePulmonary EmbolismRadionuclide ImagingSurveys and QuestionnairesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H W Gray, J H McKillop, R G Bessent. 1993. Lung scan reporting language: what does it mean?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199312000-00006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗