Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8282430

A probabilistic rule-based expert system.

Abstract

This paper explores a medical expert system combining techniques of Bayesian network modelling with ideas of weighted inference rules. The weights of the individual rules can be estimated objectively from a training set of actual cases; and they can be used in a Monte Carlo stimulation to estimate objectively conditional probabilities of diagnosis given particular combinations of symptoms. The paper describes and evaluates a medical expert system built according to this design. The diagnostic accuracy of the program was found to be similar to that obtained through the usual application of Bayes theorem with the assumption of conditional independence of symptoms given disease, even though the Bayesian classifier has more than 70 times as many numerical parameters. The method may be promising in cases where small training sets do not permit accurate estimation of large numbers of parameters.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B S Todd, R Stamper, P Macpherson. 1993. A probabilistic rule-based expert system.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(93)90030-a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Neostigmine for the treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction -- that is, massive dilation of the colon without mechanical obstruction -- may develop after surgery or severe illness. Although it may resolve with conservative therapy, colonoscopic decompression is sometimes needed to prevent ischemia and perforation of the bowel. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that neostigmine, may be an effective treatment. METHODS: We studied 21 patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. All had abdominal distention and radiographic evidence of colonic dilation, with a cecal diameter of at least 10 cm, and had had no response to at least 24 hours of conservative treatment. We randomly assigned 11 to receive 2.0 mg of neostigmine intravenously and 10 to receive intravenous saline. A physician who was unaware of the patients' treatment assignments recorded clinical response (defined as prompt evacuation of flatus or stool and a reduction in abdominal distention), abdominal circumference, and measurements of the colon on radiographs. Patients who had no response to the initial injection were eligible to receive open-label neostigmine three hours later. RESULTS: Ten of the 11 patients who received neostigmine had prompt colonic decompression, as compared with none of the 10 patients who received placebo (P<0.001). The median time to response was 4 minutes (range, 3 to 30). Seven patients in the placebo group and the one patient in the neostigmine group without an initial response received open-label neostigmine; all had colonic decompression. Two patients who had an initial response to neostigmine required colonoscopic decompression for recurrence of colonic distention; one eventually underwent subtotal colectomy. Side effects of neostigmine included abdominal pain, excess salivation, and vomiting. Symptomatic bradycardia developed in two patients and was treated with atropine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction who have not had a response to conservative therapy, treatment with neostigmine rapidly decompresses the colon.

Abdominal Pain

A midlife crisis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abdominal Pain