Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8251694

Enterococcus, an emerging pathogen.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the bacterial genus Enterococcus with respect to its epidemiology, specific infections in humans, mechanisms of resistance and tolerance, and antimicrobial treatment. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of English-language journal articles published from 1977 to 1992 was completed. Articles published prior to 1977 were identified through Index Medicus and from references appearing in the bibliographies of other journal articles. Information also was acquired from abstracts, personal communication with infectious disease specialists with active research in the area of enterococcal infection, and conference proceedings. STUDY SELECTION: In vitro data; animal models of enterococcal infection; case reports; and case-controlled, cohort, and randomized controlled trials in humans were evaluated for relevant information. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were evaluated by their methodologic strength (e.g., randomized controlled trial), reporting of clinically relevant outcomes (e.g., clinical response to antimicrobial therapy), statistical analyses, and accountability of all patients who entered the study. DATA SYNTHESIS: The incidence of enterococcal infections has increased in recent years and enterococci are now the second most frequently reported nosocomial pathogens. Enterococcus faecalis is the pathogen responsible for most enterococcal infections seen today; it has been implicated as an important cause of endocarditis, bacteremia, urinary tract infections, and intraabdominal infections. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococcal infection is of particular concern clinically because of its resistance to several antibiotics. Controlled comparative clinical trials of antimicrobial therapy in humans are lacking for several enterococcal infections. Therefore, the recommendations for antimicrobial therapy presented in this review are guidelines that reflect our current understanding of antibiotics used for enterococcal infection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S A Tailor, E M Bailey, M J Rybak. 1993. Enterococcus, an emerging pathogen.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809302701014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression. A new option for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: We describe a new manual method of phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression with a Lifestick resuscitator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 20 domestic pigs. After either 5 or 7 minutes of untreated VF, either phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression (Lifestick resuscitator) or precordial compression was initiated. Defibrillation was attempted at 2 minutes after the start of CPR. For the animals in which VF was untreated for 7 minutes, epinephrine was administered in doses of 20 micrograms/kg at 2 minutes after start of CPR. The coronary perfusion pressure generated by the Lifestick resuscitator was more than twofold greater (P < .01) than that generated by conventional precordial compression. Of 5 control animals, none were resuscitated after 5 minutes of VF. However, each of 5 animals treated with the Lifestick resuscitator was resuscitated (P < .01) and survived after 48 hours (P < .01). When untreated VF was prolonged to 7 minutes and epinephrine was administered, only 2 of the 5 control animals were resuscitated, and none of them survived for more than 4 hours. However, each of the Lifestick-treated animals was resuscitated and survived for more than 48 hours (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression substantially increased hemodynamic efficacy of CPR and outcome in terms of successful resuscitation, 48-hour survival, and cerebral recovery.

Abdomen