Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8227939

Types of optometric testing emphasized in different practice modes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to determine if tests performed in an examination vary with practice settings, we surveyed all 5,200 California licensed optometrists and asked them to identify their primary mode of practice and the percentage of time and/or frequency that certain test procedures were done in an eye examination. METHODS: We restricted our analysis to three practice modes: private, corporate, and nonprofit/health maintenance organization (NP/HMO). We received a 66.4 percent response rate. To determine any trends in emphasis of testing by the three practice modes and to establish relationships between the three, we compared each mode of practice to the other. The combinations were private vs. corporate, corporate vs. NP/HMO, and private vs. NP/HMO. The three combinations were compared to the frequency of performing case history, stereo acuity testing, binocular vision testing, biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, tonometry and perimetry. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found the following relationships in the frequency/emphasis of testing as statistically significant: 1) For stereopsis testing: private practices performed it more often than corporate; 2) For binocular vision testing: private practices performed it more than did either corporate or NP/HMO, corporate performed it more than NP/HMO; 3) For tonometry: corporate performed it slightly more than NP/HMO; 4) For dilation: NP/HMO performed it more than both private and corporate; and 5) For perimetry: private performed it more than both corporate and NP/HMO.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Thal, C Hisaka, R Melrose, I Lopez, A Wai, M Woo. 1993. Types of optometric testing emphasized in different practice modes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8227939/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗