Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8184393

Multiple primary lung cancers.

Abstract

Between 1970 and 1990, of 1287 patients undergoing resection for primary lung cancer, we considered 55 (4.3%) to have a second primary lung cancer, being synchronous in 15 cases (1.2%) and metachronous in 40 (3.1%). Two patients had a third primary lung cancer. The 15 patients with synchronous cancers were all treated surgically: ten underwent a two-stage procedure and 5 patients a one-stage. In 6 patients the cancers were located bilaterally and in 4 patients both synchronous cancers had a different histology. There were 3 postoperative deaths (20%). The 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 26% and 15%. Of the 40 patients with metachronous cancers the mean interval between treatment of their first and second cancer was 5 years and 11 months. It was longer for the 21 patients having a contralateral second localization (7 years) than for those having an ipsilateral localization (4 years). There was no dependence of the intervals on whether or not the second cancer had the same histology as the first cancer. In 7 patients the second cancer was treated by chemo- and/or radiotherapy and in 33 patients by surgery. There were 5 postoperative deaths in this group (15.2%). The 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 33% and 18%. For 25 patients with a stage I or II second cancer these rates were 42% and 27%; all 8 patients with a stage III second cancer died within 14 months. Survival was positively affected by: histological type differing between both cancers, an interval of more than 3 years, a bilateral localization, and a stage I or II second cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A F Verhagen, G Tavilla, H J van de Wal, A L Cox, L K Lacquet. 1994. Multiple primary lung cancers.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1016453

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The case for routine use of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis for most patients. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, providing the only realistic hope of long-term survival. Even with optimal surgical management, 5-year survival averages 15% to 20% for resectable disease. Progress is being made, however. Currently, the benefits of postoperative therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear clear, and recommendations for such therapy appear to us to be well justified. Additional benefit to patients awaits the development of new agents, molecular targeted drugs, and novel approaches such as immunotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Proposal for a new definition of true cardia carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It remains controversial whether cardia carcinoma should be categorized and treated as esophageal cancer or gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a reasonable definition of cardia carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with Siewert type II carcinomas were divided into two subgroups: 25 patients with a tumor center within 1 cm of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (type IIA) and 22 patients with tumor center 1-2 cm aboral of the EGJ (type IIB). Patients with subcardia carcinomas, 40 with invasion to the EGJ (type III) and 110 without (type IIIe-), were used as controls. RESULTS: The patients with type IIB carcinomas showed no different characteristics from those with type III or type IIIe- carcinomas, except for the stage of the disease. On the other hand, those with type IIA carcinomas were associated with a higher male/female ratio, higher incidences of elevated appearance, differentiated histology, and mediastinal node metastasis, and a significantly lower survival rate as compared with patients with subcardia carcinomas. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that type IIA is a significant prognostic determinant, but that type IIB is not. CONCLUSION: Type IIA carcinomas should be treated as true cardia carcinoma; type IIB as subcardia carcinoma. Our results should be confirmed by a prospective study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Favorable indications for hepatectomy in patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) is dismal. The purpose of this study was to review our recent outcomes of hepatectomy for LMGC and to determine the suitable candidates for surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The outcomes of 37 patients with LMGC who underwent hepatectomy between 1990 and 2005 were assessed. No extrahepatic distant metastasis and feasibility of macroscopic curative resection were requisite indications for surgery. The prognostic values of clinicopathological factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. The median survival time and overall 5-year survival rate after hepatectomy of the patients with LMGC were 31 months and 11%, respectively. Intrahepatic recurrence following hepatectomy was found in 23 patients (62%). Variables independently associated with poor survival were bilobar metastasis (P = 0.002, CI = 1.9-16.3) and a maximum tumor diameter of >or= 4 cm (P = 0.006, CI = 1.4-7.7). The depth of the primary tumor and the timing of metastasis were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection for LMGC may be indicated in patients with unilobar metastasis and/or tumors less than 4 cm in diameter. Synchronous metastasis is not a contraindication for hepatectomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗