Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8146437

Circadian rhythms.

F W Turek
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Changes in behavior which occur on a daily or circadian basis represent one of the most ubiquitous strategies by which most living organisms have adapted to their environment. Underlying the daily changes in behavior are a multitude of endocrine and metabolic rhythms which provide adaptively significant temporal organization within the organism. In mammals there appears to be a central circadian clock in the SCN which is responsible for generating and coordinating the entire 24-hour temporal organization of the animal. The circadian clock regulates the timing, duration, and characteristics of sleep, and together the circadian clock and sleep interact to control the timing of endocrine secretions. While the impact of disturbed endocrine circadian rhythms for the survival of the species has received very little attention, the almost universal presence of circadian rhythmicity within the endocrine system argues in support of the hypothesis that a disruption of the normal circadian organization within the endocrine system can have serious consequences for the health and well-being of the organism. It is particularly noteworthy that in advanced age, various alterations in circadian endocrine rhythms have been observed and these alterations may impair the ability of the animal to adapt normally to the environment. Relatively speaking, the study of circadian rhythms is a new field of biology, and as a result, much remains to be discovered about the physiological mechanisms that underlie rhythmicity, as well as the functional significance of 24-hour temporal organization for the survival of the species.

Explore related subjects

Activity CyclesAnimalsCircadian RhythmEndocrine GlandsFeedbackHumansLightPhotoreceptor CellsSuprachiasmatic NucleusJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F W Turek. 1994. Circadian rhythms.. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-571149-4.50007-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Dissociation of the rat motor activity rhythm under T cycles shorter than 24 hours.

Since the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) were identified as the principal mammalian circadian clock, many studies describing their morphology and physiology have been carried out. Today, the multioscillatory nature of the SCN, which explains the dissociation of the circadian rhythms under some experimental conditions, is widely accepted. Here, we study the simultaneous presence of two circadian rhythms in the motor activity of the rat when exposed to symmetric light-dark (LD) cycles shorter than 24 h (T21, T21.5, T22, T22.5, T23, and T23.5). One rhythmic component was entrained by the external LD cycle whereas the other ran free with a period longer than 24 h. The results show that two circadian rhythms were present only when T was shorter than T23, whereas at T23.5 only one entrained component was manifested. The manifestation of the two circadian components depends quantitatively on the period of the external cycle--i.e., the strength of the entrained rhythm increases when the external T is closer to 24 h--whereas that of the nonentrained rhythm decreases. The dissociation of the motor activity rhythm and the gradual appearance of the two components are explained by considering the entrainment of a multioscillatory system as not taking place as a whole but rather in a partial manner, in such a way that some oscillators may entrain but not others. The effect of the entrained oscillators is added to the masking effect of the LD cycles.

Activity Cycles↗
PubMed1998

Circadian and ultradian clock-controlled rhythms in unicellular microorganisms.

The time structure of a biological system is at least as intricate as its spatial structure. Whereas we have detailed information about the latter, our understanding of the former is still rudimentary. As techniques for monitoring intracellular processes continuously in single cells become more refined, it becomes increasingly evident that periodic behaviour abounds in all time domains. Circadian timekeeping dominates in natural environments. Here the free-running period is about 24 h. Circadian rhythms in eukaryotes and prokaryotes allow predictive matching of intracellular states with environmental changes during the daily cycles. Unicellular organisms provide excellent systems for the study of these phenomena, which pervade all higher life forms. Intracellular timekeeping is essential. The presence of a temperature-compensated oscillator provides such a timer. The coupled outputs (epigenetic oscillations) of this ultradian clock constitute a special class of ultradian rhythm. These are undamped and endogenously driven by a device which shows biochemical properties characteristic of transcriptional and translational elements. Energy-yielding processes, protein turnover, motility and the timing of the cell-division cycle processes are all controlled by the ultradian clock. Different periods characterize different species, and this indicates a genetic determinant. Periods range from 30 min to 4 h. Mechanisms of clock control are being elucidated; it is becoming evident that many different control circuits can provide these functions.

Activity Cycles↗
PubMed1997

Influence of a GABA(B) receptor antagonist on the sleep-waking cycle in the rat.

The influence of CGP 35348 (a GABA(B) receptor antagonist) on the sleep-waking cycle was studied in rats. The animals were injected i.p. at the beginning of the light period and the data expressed by 2-h periods and total duration (6 h). At 100 mg/kg, slow-wave sleep (SWS) was decreased during the 6-h recording with a peculiar decrease during the first 2 h. SWS was subdivided into three stages: slow-waves; spindles occurring as SWS deepens; and intermediate stage appearing prior to paradoxical sleep (PS). Only the slow-wave stage and intermediate stage were decreased. Waking was increased during the 6-h recording. It was subdivided into waking with hippocampal theta rhythm (psychomotor active waking) and waking without theta activity (quiet waking). Both were increased during the first 2 h. However, quiet waking was increased throughout the recording duration. At 300 mg/kg, SWS was decreased during the three 2-h periods. This decrease was principally related to a decrease of the slow-wave stage. PS was increased over the 6-h recording with a marked increase during the second 2-h period. Consequently, under the influence of the GABA(B) receptor antagonist, the SWS was decreased at the expense of behavioral stages with cortical low-voltage activity (waking and PS). GABAergic neurons are present in the mesopontine structures responsible for these two stages. We can conclude that endogenous GABA acting at the GABA(B) receptor level participates in the regulation of waking and PS.

Activity Cycles↗