Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8010701

Zonular function: a new hypothesis with clinical implications.

Abstract

A new hypothesis about zonular function is presented that has implications in regard to the cause and treatment of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. This hypothesis is based on the concept that the lens is under constant tension. The anterior and posterior zonules serve a different function than do the equatorial zonules. The anterior and posterior zonules are passive in terms of structural support of the lens; the equatorial zonules are the active components during accommodation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Schachar. Zonular function: a new hypothesis with clinical implications.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8010701/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Optical feedback controlled scleral remodeling as a mechanism for myopic eye growth.

Experimental studies of myopia have demonstrated that optical errors imposed on a developing eye will stimulate elongation of the globe, although the mechanism of axial growth is not well understood. In this study, a mathematical model of eye growth is presented in which expansion of the globe occurs as the elastic deformations of the scleral shell are incorporated into the zero stress configuration of the eye during the scleral remodeling process. The rate of remodeling is determined by the retinal blur and the amplitude of accommodation, which provide feedback loops for both unilateral and bilateral hyperopic refractive error-compensation. Normal eye growth and experimental myopia are simulated in tree shrews, a small mammal related to primates. The model demonstrates that the rate of ocular elongation in experimental myopia may be controlled by regulating the rate of soft tissue remodeling in the scleral shell.

Accommodation, Ocular

The distance angle to target in surgery for intermittent exotropia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with intermittent exotropia may have an increase in their angle of strabismus in the distance when the angle is measured either after 1 hour of monocular occlusion or while the patients fixate on a distant target outdoors. The hypothesis that surgery should be performed for this larger deviation has been suggested but not tested. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that surgery should be performed for the increased angle of strabismus in the distance in patients with intermittent exotropia and to investigate the factors that influence the angle of misalignment. METHODS: A prospective, clinical trial was conducted of patients with intermittent exotropia in whom the angle of misalignment in the distance increased after 1 hour of monocular occlusion or while the patients fixated on an outdoor target. The study group underwent surgery for the largest deviation measured; the control group underwent surgery for the initial angle measured at 6 m. All patients in whom the angle of misalignment increased while the patients were looking at an outdoor target were additionally measured in indoor illumination at 24 m and also at 6 m under floodlights that simulated outdoor illumination. Ninety patients undergoing surgery were randomized. RESULTS: Forty-three (86.0%) of the 50 patients undergoing surgery for the largest angle measured had a satisfactory outcome vs 25 (62.5%) of the 40 patients in the control group (P<.001). The mechanism for the increase in exotropia while fixating on an outdoor target was studied in 76 patients, and the results were variable. CONCLUSIONS: The angle of strabismus in patients with intermittent exotropia undergoing surgery should be measured while the patients fixate on an outdoor target and after 1 hour of monocular occlusion. Surgery should be performed for the largest angle measured.

Accommodation, Ocular

Distance/near differences in intermittent exotropia.

BACKGROUND: Burian's classification of exotropia based on the difference between the distance deviation and near deviation (distance/near differences) leaves some questions unanswered. Controversy exists concerning whether the divergence excess pattern is caused by an excess of divergence or by excessive accommodative convergence. Much of the literature on this subject has been confusing because investigators did not eliminate tenacious proximal fusion as an artifact in calculating the ratio of accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A ratio). Previously, one of us (B.J.K.) proposed a classification system that respected this artifact and subdivided the classification system proposed by Burian. METHODS: A total of 202 consecutive patients with an exotropia underwent a series of measurements to determine the respective role of accommodative convergence and tenacious proximal fusion as a cause for their distance/near differences. In addition, the value obtained by a rapid prism adaptation test as a possible substitute for 1 hour of monocular occlusion was studied. RESULTS: In 98 patients, the initial distance deviation exceeded the near deviation. In 10 patients, the distance/near differences were caused by a high AC/A ratio, which would have been mislabeled by Burian's classification system. Brown's recommendation of using +3.00-diopter lenses at near to diagnose simulated divergence excess would have led to the misdiagnosis of a high AC/A ratio in 61 of these patients. In 26 patients, the near deviation exceeded the distance deviation. Burian's classification would have incorrectly labeled 2 patients as having convergence insufficiency when, in fact, they had pseudoconvergence insufficiency. The new proposed classification system proved 100% sensitive and 100% specific (6 of 6 patients for both parameters) for identifying preoperatively exotropic patients who postoperatively developed an esotropia at near with a high AC/A ratio. Rapid prism adaptation tests at near proved useful for identifying the presence of tenacious proximal fusion, but were not accurate in its quantification. CONCLUSIONS: The validity and utility of the new classification system was confirmed. Identification of exotropic patients with a high AC/A ratio and consideration of nonsurgical treatment is important. The rapid prism adaptation test is qualitatively, but not quantitatively, the same as 1 hour of monocular occlusion.

Accommodation, Ocular