Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7992873

Limit setting: theory, techniques, and risks.

Abstract

Limit setting is a necessary aspect of clinical treatment but the professional literature on this subject is relatively sparse and does not address many core issues, including some countertransferential and ethical problems raised by the approach. Many clinicians struggle with the "authoritarian" nature of limit setting, especially when they have great power over patients as in a hospital setting. This paper traces the theory of limit setting back to Freud's conception of "acting-out in the transference" and the corresponding need by clinicians to manage nihilistic behavior which threatens the treatment process, whether inpatient or outpatient. When done properly, setting limits makes working with acting-out patients viable, enabling them both to master devastating early experiences and to replace restraint by others with self-control. Techniques are addressed which lead to the responsible and effective use of power, but at the same time observing the social and practical limits inherent in the approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Pam. 1994. Limit setting: theory, techniques, and risks.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.3.432

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The pediatric emotional distress scale: a brief screening measure for young children exposed to traumatic events.

Introduced the Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale (PEDS), which was developed to quickly assess behaviors identified in empirical and theoretical literature as significantly elevated in children after experiencing traumatic events. The 21-item parent-report rating scale includes 17 general behavior items and 4 trauma-specific items. Factor analyses on the 17 items, with 475 two- to ten-year-olds (traumatic event exposure and nontraumatic event exposure), yielded 3 reliable factors labeled Anxious/Withdrawn, Fearful, and Acting Out. Factor and total scores were shown to have good internal consistency, and both test-retest and interrater reliability were at acceptable levels. Discriminant analyses demonstrated the PEDS could distinguish traumatic event exposure and nonexposure groups, although maternal education should be a significant consideration in interpretation. Future research with diverse populations who have documented trauma is needed to enhance the utility of the full PEDS scale.

Acting Out

The neurobiology of suicide risk: a review for the clinician.

Suicidal behavior has neurobiological determinants independent of the psychiatric illnesses with which it is associated. We have found that some patients with major depression are vulnerable to acting on suicidal impulses. This vulnerability results from the interaction between triggers or precipitants and the threshold for suicidal behavior. An important factor in setting an individual's threshold for acting on suicidal impulses is brain serotonergic function. Serotonin function has been shown to be lower in suicide attempters by studies measuring serotonin metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid and studies of prolactin response to fenfluramine. Postmortem studies of suicide victims also reveal decreased serotonin activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. New neuroimaging paradigms, such as positron emission tomography (PET), offer an opportunity to visualize serotonin function in vivo in a more direct way than has previously been available. This technology may provide the possibility of timely therapeutic intervention in patients at high risk for suicide.

Acting Out

Projective identification, countertransference, and the struggle for understanding over acting out.

Projective identification is examined as an intrapsychic and interpersonal phenomenon that draws the analyst into various forms of acting out. The therapist struggles to use understanding and interpretation as the method of working through the mutual desire to act out the patient's core fantasies and feelings. Clinical material is used to illustrate the ways in which projective identification affects the analytic relationship. The focus is on methods of using interpretation to shift from mutual acting out to mutual understanding.

Acting Out