Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7934538

Effect on coronary atherosclerosis of decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations in normocholesterolaemic patients. Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project (HARP) Group.

Abstract

Lipid-lowering therapy ameliorates coronary atherosclerosis in patients with raised concentrations of low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. We have investigated whether a similar benefit can be obtained in normocholesterolaemic patients. We studied 79 normocholesterolaemic patients with coronary heart disease (70 male, 9 female), mean age 58 years, all non-smokers, with mean total cholesterol concentration 5.5 mmol/L. All patients received diet therapy and were randomly assigned placebo (39) or active treatment (40) with pravastatin, nicotinic acid, cholestyramine, and gemfibrozil stepwise as needed to reach the specified goal (total cholesterol < or = 4.1 mmol/L, ratio of LDL/high-density-lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol < or = 2.0). Coronary angiograms at baseline and after 2.5 years of treatment were analysed by computer-assisted quantitative techniques. There was no significant difference in coronary atherosclerosis during follow-up between the active treatment and placebo groups; the mean minimum diameter narrowed significantly but to the same extent in both groups (change baseline to 2.5 years 0.14 [SD 0.42] and 0.15 [0.42] mm, respectively, both p < 0.001). Similarly, the change in percentage stenosis did not differ between the groups (2.1 [10.6] vs 2.4 [10.3]%). By multiple regression analysis, the adjusted difference between the groups was a 0.04 mm (95% CI -0.04 to 0.12 mm) increase in minimum diameter and a 0% (-1.7 to 1.7) change in percentage stenosis. The groups differed significantly in plasma lipids (% change in active minus % change in placebo group: -28% total cholesterol, -41% LDL-cholesterol, 13% HDL-cholesterol, -26% triglycerides, -31% apolipoprotein B, all p < 0.001). Thus, intensive pharmacological treatment of normocholesterolaemic patients has significant effects on plasma lipid concentrations but no angiographically measurable benefit on the coronary arteries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F M Sacks, R C Pasternak, C M Gibson, B Rosner, P H Stone. 1994-10-29. Effect on coronary atherosclerosis of decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations in normocholesterolaemic patients. Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project (HARP) Group.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90506-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering--morning versus evening statin administration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best time to administer statins for optimal lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by reviewing the clinical evidence evaluating the chronobiologic effects of morning versus evening statin administration. DATA SOURCES: Using the MeSH terms HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins, morning and evening dosing, and clinical trials, a literature review was conducted to identify articles in MEDLINE (1966-December 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 2006), and IOWA Drug Information Systems (1985-December 2006). DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven English-language studies evaluating morning and evening statin administration were identified and evaluated. Based on the available data, simvastatin demonstrated a pronounced LDL-C percentage reduction with evening dosing. Although not statistically significant, a trend in the LDL-C percentage reduction favoring evening statin administration was noted with lovastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin. Atorvastatin demonstrated similar LDL-C reduction regardless of administration time. With the exception of simvastatin, the trials comparing morning versus evening effects of statins on LDL-C have several significant methodologic shortcomings, including small sample size, lack of statistical power, and inappropriate exclusion criteria that did not include or did not mention drug-induced effects on lipids. CONCLUSIONS: There are sufficient data to support evening administration of simvastatin to achieve optimal lowering of LDL-C levels. Rigorous and robust trials are necessary to determine the best administration time to achieve optimal LDL-C lowering for lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and fluvastatin.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Will torcetrapib be the next big thing in coronary heart disease risk reduction?

Scientists are seeking ways to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol to lower coronary heart disease (CHD). Emerging from this search is torcetrapib, a partial inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Via this mechanism, cholesteryl ester is prevented from being transferred to apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and is retained in HDL particles, where ostensibly it may be delivered directly to the liver for elimination. Proof that this may reduce atherosclerotic vascular disease is provided by population studies of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) deficiencies and single nucleotide polymorphisms of CETP, and experiments in animal models treated with torcetrapib. Torcetrapib effectively raises HDL cholesterol when used alone and when added to background therapy with atorvastatin. The drug appears to be well tolerated. Large surrogate and survival outcome trials are underway to document its impact on CHD.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗