PubMed · 789929
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R H de Jong. 1976-11-08. Kidney retrieval.. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.236.19.2215
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
STUDY DESIGN: Human cadaveric lumbar spines underwent placement of threaded fusion cages (TFCs) in either an anterior or transverse orientation. Spines underwent load testing and angular rotation measurement in the intact state, after diskectomy, after cage placement, and after fatiguing. Angular rotations were compared between cage orientations and interventions. OBJECTIVE: To determine which cage orientation resulted in greater immediate stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been extensive biomechanical study of interbody fusion cages. The lateral orientation has been increasingly used for intervertebral fusion, but a direct biomechanical comparison between cages implanted either anteriorly or transversely in human cadaveric spines has not been performed. METHODS: Fourteen spines were randomized into the anterior group (anterior diskectomy and dual anterior cage placement) and the lateral group (lateral diskectomy and single transverse cage placement). Pure bending moments of 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Nm were applied in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Load testing was performed while intact, after diskectomy, after cage placement, and after fatiguing. Angular rotation was compared between anterior and lateral groups and, within each group, among the different interventions. RESULTS: Segmental ranges of motion were similar between spines undergoing either anterior or lateral cage implantation. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate few differences between angular rotation after either anterior or lateral TFC implantation. These findings add to data that find few differences between orientation of implanted TFCs. Combined with a decreased risk of adjacent structure injury through a lateral approach, these data support a lateral approach for lumbar interbody fusion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Although rare, renal cell carcinoma has been found during renal recovery for cadaveric organ transplantation. Previously, we reported this incidence to be 0.9%. In one cadaveric donor, the liver and left kidney had been transplanted before the discovery of renal cell carcinoma (T1) in the right kidney. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of two patients who had received cadaveric allografts from a donor with a known renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Both patients have been followed for 4 years with blood chemistries and chest x-ray every 3 months for year 1, every 4 months for years 2 and 3, and every 6 months thereafter. They also underwent allograft ultrasound every 6 months and an annual CT scan of the abdomen. Both patients have shown no evidence of metastatic disease throughout their follow-up. DISCUSSION: In the rare instance that a patient receives an organ from a cadaveric donor with a known renal cell carcinoma, it is mandatory to follow these patients closely observing for both allograft recurrence and metastatic disease.