Rational vancomycin use recommendations.

C M Hitt; B Cooper; H M Crowe

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7895478

Rational vancomycin use recommendations.

C M Hitt·B Cooper·H M Crowe

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of VRE will dramatically affect the management of infections in hospitalized patients, as well as increase morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin is the therapy of choice for certain gram-positive infections in patients with significant allergic histories to beta-lactam antibiotics and for infections with gram-positive microorganisms that are resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics. Conservative use of vancomycin in the future may help to avoid the further development of resistant organisms.

Explore related subjects

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic United States Vancomycin Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C M Hitt, B Cooper, H M Crowe. 1995. Rational vancomycin use recommendations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7895478/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Fifty years of epidemiology at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: significant and consequential.

The Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) was the vision of Alexander Langmuir, who developed a program with a vital mission to address an unmet need in the United States. The Communicable Disease Center, now the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, Georgia), and the EIS steadily expanded from focusing on infectious disease to address chronic diseases, health statistics, occupational and environmental health and safety, injury prevention and control, and reproductive health. Langmuir recognized the need for epidemiologists to collaborate with others, initially from the laboratory and later including veterinarians, demographers, statisticians, nutritionists, behavioral and social scientists, industrial hygienists, and sanitarians. These partnerships stimulated the further evolution of the EIS Program to include sophisticated statistical analysis, economics, and the tools of the behavioral and social sciences. A mixture of analytical rigor and practical application characterizes the practice of epidemiology at CDC and in the EIS. Thus, the "significant" in the title of this paper refers to the analytical rigor of the public health approach and the validity of the results, while the "consequential" reflects the practical application of the results, trying to make a difference in health outcomes.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

PubMed2001

Epidemic intelligence service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 50 years of training and service in applied epidemiology.

The Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) was established in 1951 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, as a combined training and service program in the practice of applied epidemiology. Since then, nearly 2,500 professionals have served in this 2-year program of the US Public Health Service. The experience of an EIS Officer has been modified because of the increased need for more sophisticated analytical methods and the use of microcomputers, as well as CDC's expanded mission into chronic diseases, environmental health, occupational health, and injury control. Officers who have entered the EIS in the past 20 years are more likely than their predecessors to stay in public health either at the federal level or in state and local health departments. The EIS Program continues to be a critical source for health professionals trained to respond to the demand for epidemiologic services both domestically and internationally.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

PubMed2001

Partnerships in international applied epidemiology training and service, 1975-2001.

In 1951 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created the Epidemic Intelligence Service to provide training and epidemiologic service on the model of a clinical residency program. By January 2001, an additional 28 applied epidemiology and training programs (AETPs) had been implemented around the globe (with over 945 graduates and 420 persons currently in training). Field Epidemiology Training Programs and Public Health Schools Without Walls are the most common models. Applied epidemiologists, or field epidemiologists, use science as the basis for intervention programs designed to improve public health. AETPs train people by providing them with health competencies through providing service to public health intervention programs and strengthening health systems. AETPs are relatively expensive to create and maintain, but they are highly sustainable and can produce immediate benefits. Of the 19 programs that began before 1997, 18 (95%) continue to produce graduates. The Training Programs in Epidemiology for Public Health Interventions Network was organized in 1997 to provide support, peer review, and quality assurance for AETPs. In 2001, new programs are planned or in development in India, Argentina, China, and Russia.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗