Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7895108

[Environments and handicaps].

Abstract

Chronic deficiencies have been known ever since man left traces of his own existence but have increased since the 19th century. The number of people with chronic deficiencies in France is close to five millions, of which 1,2 million are very severe. This figure does not include occasional deficiencies due to age or "normal" transitory situations of life. These deficiencies engender disabilities which themselves create a handicap. Particular attention to environmental conditions is required to cope with such situation and try and equalize opportunities and reduce exclusion. This is a part of the scope of medicine if the aim is, as Pr. B. Glorion reminded us recently "to treat and cure but also maintain the patients physical and moral equilibrium". Reeducation is concerned with the person, rehabilitation with the adaptation of the individual and collective environment. It is in intervening in this area, that it becomes possible to reduce otherwise overwhelming inequalities. "What constitutes real democracy is not to recognise equals but to make them equal" (Gambetta). While it remains necessary to answer to the requirements of individual situations, it is on the wider and collective front that solutions must be found in order to deal with the greater situational difficulties of collective life. To be efficient, the principles of action must leave behind conventional classifications and attempt to solve the functional difficulties: daily life activities, transportation, work, education, access to social life. Given pressure from individuals, often grouped in associations, and from medical practitioners sensitive to these problems, laws have been passed and local authorities have adapted infrastructures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Mathé. 1994. [Environments and handicaps].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7895108/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to highlight and at the same time criticize the holistic view of health expressed in the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)". Particular attention will be paid to the idea suggested in the ICF that not only the ability to perform a specified action but also its actual performance is included in the person's health. My argument intends to show that this is an untenable position. METHOD: The theoretical platform of this paper is philosophical action theory. My argument makes particular use of the distinctions between ability, opportunity, activity and will. My analysis also uses some insights from the contemporary philosophical discussion of health concepts. CONCLUSIONS: Ability (or capacity) and its opposite disability (or incapacity) are essential ingredients in the implicit philosophy of health of the ICF. However, the ICF also puts an emphasis on the actual performance of actions. This is entailed by the performance qualifier that is included in the ICF. I give some arguments for questioning the relevance of this qualifier if it is intended to have a place in the concept of health or have a general function for decisions in health care or rehabilitation. Instead I suggest the introduction of an opportunity qualifier, which could fulfill some of the purposes intended for the performance qualifier.

Persons with Disabilities↗