Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7890592

[Breast echography].

Abstract

The ultrasonography of the breast is an essential technique in the diagnosis of mammary disease as mammography and fine needle aspiration. Ultrasound is extremely reliable in differentiating cystic from solid lesions. Three signs are the most significant in the diagnosis between benign tumors and well circumscribed cancer: shape and margins of the mass, depth/width ratio, feature of the connective tissue and adjacent structures. In association with mammography, sonography is most likely significant in breast screening cancer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Brombart. 1995. [Breast echography].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7890592/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Expression of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase in benign and malignant lesions of the breast and measurement of nitric oxide using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) is present in various human solid tumors and tumor cell lines, and it is believed that NO plays an important role in tumor growth. An increased NO concentration catalyzed by NO synthase (NOS) is cytotoxic and can promote apoptosis. The expression of endothelial NOS (e-NOS) and induced NOS (i-NOS) was examined in various breast tumors. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody (Ab) against e-NOS and a polyclonal Ab against i-NOS was performed on paraffin embedded tissues from 41 benign breast lesions, 9 in situ breast lesions, and 54 invasive breast lesions. Functionality was confirmed by detection of NO using spin-trapping electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. RESULTS: e-NOS expression was found in 2 benign lesions (5%; 1 fibroadenoma and 1 proliferative mastopathy), in 5 in situ lesions (56%), and in 33 invasive lesions (61%). None of the benign lesions was positive for i-NOS, but 6 in situ lesions (67%) and 33 invasive lesions (61%) showed tumor cell staining. In particular, capillaries that were embedded in lymphocytic stroma showed a positive reaction for e-NOS. The functionality of NOS was demonstrated by direct NO formation using the EPR spin-trapping method. Tumors that were positive for e-NOS were observed more often in younger patients (P = 0.05). These tumors more frequently were highly differentiated or moderately differentiated and more often showed invasive ductal subtypes and a lower proliferation rate. Tumors that were positive for both e-NOS and i-NOS were more likely to be lymph node negative tumors. Both i-NOS-expressing lesions and e-NOS-expressing lesions showed strong coexpression (P = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: NOS is detected predominantly in in situ lesions and invasive breast lesions but rarely in benign lesions. NOS is found more frequently in invasive carcinomas with low malignancy. Using the spin-trapping EPR method, this study demonstrates direct NO formation in human breast tumors for the first time.

Breast Diseases↗

Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.

The objective of this study was a comparison of a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system and a conventional screen-film mammography (SFM) system with respect to the detectability of simulated small masses and microcalcifications in the magnification mode. All images were obtained using 1.8 times magnification. The FFDM images were obtained at radiation dose levels of 1.39, 1.0, 0.7, 0.49 and 0.24 times that of the SFM images. A contrast-detail phantom was used to compare the detection of simulated lesions using a four alternative forced-choice reader study with three readers. The correct observation ratio (COR) was calculated as the fraction of correctly identified lesions to the total number of simulated lesions. Soft-copy reading was performed for all digital images. Direct magnification images acquired with the digital system showed a lower object contrast threshold than those acquired with the conventional system. For equal radiation dose, the digital system provided a significantly increased COR (0.95) compared with the screen-film system (0.82). For simulated microcalcifications, the corresponding difference was 0.90 to 0.72. The digital system allowed equal detection to screen-film at 40% of the radiation dose used for screen film. Digital magnification images are superior to screen-film magnification images for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications even at a lower radiation dose.

Breast Diseases↗