Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7842375

Evaluating a computer-based experiential learning simulation: a case study using criterion-referenced testing.

Abstract

A case study of a computer-based experiential learning program involving the use of criterion-referenced testing as a quantitative evaluation tool is described. The simulation was designed to introduce nurses to basic computer operations. One hundred and thirty-eight nurses participated in the evaluation using a specially prepared version of the program that recorded the time required to perform actions, the number of unsuccessful attempts to complete instructions, and the number of correct responses to specific questions. The ability of the nurses to "drag and drop" increased significantly from less than 20% to more than 90% (p < .05, Student's t-test). Their knowledge of the definitions of four computer-related terms (i.e., trackball, desktop, window, and icon) increased significantly (from 65% to 80%, p < .1). In subjective evaluations, 82% of respondents reported that they enjoyed the lesson and 89% wanted more computer-based instructional units to be developed. Use of criterion-referenced testing helped to shed new light on the utility of such computer aided instructional systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D F Sittig, Z Jiang, S Manfre, K Sinkfeld, R Ginn, L Smith, A Olsen, R Borden. Evaluating a computer-based experiential learning simulation: a case study using criterion-referenced testing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7842375/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Research training in six selected internal medicine fellowship programs.

BACKGROUND: Effective July 1997, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) established a research pathway to certification to encourage research training of general internists and subspecialists. OBJECTIVE: To document the current status of research training in six selected subspecialty programs, to examine opportunities available for trainees to undertake formal course work, and to report the percentage of subspecialty programs that might accept research pathway fellows. DESIGN: National Study of Graduate Education in Internal Medicine questionnaires from 1996-1997 and 1997-1998. SETTING: Programs in internal medicine subspecialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. PARTICIPANTS: 1163 (84%) and 1094 (79%) directors of internal medicine subspecialty programs in 1996-1997 and 1997-1998, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions on the amount of time fellows usually spend conducting research and available opportunities to pursue course work leading to an advanced degree. RESULTS: On average, during their last year of training, fellows enrolled in infectious disease, nephrology, endocrinology, and rheumatology programs spent 40% to 50% of their time conducting research, whereas fellows in gastroenterology and cardiology spent 25% to 30% of their time conducting research. Compared with programs sponsored by major teaching hospitals, a greater percentage of programs sponsored by academic medical center hospitals planned to accept persons interested in pursuing the new ABIM Research Pathway (28% vs. 8%) and to provide opportunities for fellows to obtain an advanced degree (60% vs. 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Few internal medicine subspecialty programs are currently designed to provide adequate research training as defined by the Institute of Medicine and the ABIM.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Development of a best-practice model at a university hospital to increase efficiency in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

An economic evaluation of drug acquisition, nursing care, pharmacy time, laboratory costs, supplies, and ancillary care was conducted as a first step toward developing a pneumonia management plan at the University of Kentucky Medical Center (UKMC). UKMC costs were compared with costs at other hospitals treating pneumonia patients on Medicare. Overall costs for pneumonia at the 25% of hospitals nationwide with the lowest costs for Medicare patients with this condition were determined and compared with costs at UKMC. Against nationwide benchmarks, efficiencies at UKMC for treating simple pneumonia ranged from 45% for pharmacy expenses to 81% for nursing costs. Efficiencies for complicated pneumonia ranged from 47% for laboratory costs to 67% for nursing costs. The most cost-efficient antimicrobial treatment options were promoted and integrated into a pneumonia management plan based on Infectious Diseases Society of America treatment guidelines. A comparison of pneumonia treatment costs at UKMC with those at the 25% of hospitals nationwide with the lowest treatment costs for Medicare patients with pneumonia revealed that UKMC pharmacy costs could be optimized. Strategies for standardizing the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are being implemented.

Academic Medical Centers↗