Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7811544

Resistant candidiasis.

Abstract

Mucosal (oropharyngeal, esophageal, and, in women, vaginal) candidiasis is a common infectious complication in HIV-infected patients. There is a wide range of drugs to treat or suppress Candida infections. However, with the increasingly common use of fluconazole as treatment or prophylaxis in patients with relatively advanced HIV disease, mucosal candidiasis that is clinically resistant to fluconazole is increasingly recognized. Susceptibility testing for fluconazole has not been well standardized, and laboratory and clinical correlations often have been difficult to demonstrate. However, the frequency with which Candida strains resistant to fluconazole can be isolated appears to be increasing, particularly in patients with advanced HIV disease. Anecdotal results suggest that patients who fail fluconazole therapy usually do not respond to higher doses of fluconazole, but may occasionally respond to itraconazole or ketoconazole. In vitro susceptibility to these agents does not necessarily ensure clinical efficacy. Amphotericin B is usually effective initially but requires parenteral administration. However, with any therapy, relapses tend to occur and progressively recalcitrant disease often occurs, with increasing morbidity for patients. There is a clear need for studies addressing the incidence of resistance, the risk factors for its development, and more effective therapy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W G Powderly. 1994. Resistant candidiasis.. https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.1994.10.925

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prospective study of etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: To study prospectively HIV-positive patients admitted to the hospital because of pneumonia by extensive laboratory tests to determine specific microbiologic diagnoses and to establish the best clinical diagnosis after review of all available data by expert clinicians. METHODS: Patients admitted to one of two hospitals had extensive questionnaires completed and defined diagnostic tests performed on blood, sputum, urine and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, when available. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients had a diagnosis of pneumonia verified. A definite or probable etiologic diagnosis was made in 155 (67%) of these patients. Pneumocystis carinii caused 35% of all cases of pneumonia. Twenty-seven percent of cases of pneumonia with a single etiology had a definite or probable bacterial etiology. 'Atypical agents' were distinctly uncommon. Few clinical or laboratory parameters could differentiate specific etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: P. carinii continues to be a common cause of pneumonia in these patients. The rarity of 'atypical agents' could simplify the empiric approach to therapy. Despite the use of extensive testing we did not find a definite etiology in a large number of cases.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗