Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7808033

Solid tumor treatment workshop summary.

Abstract

Retinoic acids exert a wide range of biological activities following binding to the cognate nuclear receptors, which has several members (RAR-alpha, beta, gamma and RXR-alpha, beta, gamma). Retinoic acids lead to several different effects on tumor cells and include cell differentiation, inhibition of cell proliferation and apoptosis. The expression and abundance of each receptor type, and the distinct role of each receptor type related to biologic effect is under investigation. Similarly the mechanism(s) responsible for favorable responses in certain tumor types (skin, cervical) needs to be understood to best utilize this family of compounds, either alone or in various combinations. The significancer of drug-drug interaction in regard to their effects on pharmacokinetics, receptor modulation and regulation of cytoplasmic retinoic acid receptor binding proteins (CRABPs) should be carefully evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical trials. Furthermore, appropriate models to study combinations of RAs with other biological response modifiers are needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P S Gill, D Parkinson. 1994. Solid tumor treatment workshop summary.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7808033/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

[Gene expression profiles in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer].

DNA-microarray technology can be used to assess the expression of several thousands of genes at the same time. The identification of the gene expression profiles may help to better characterize human cancer. These studies may reveal subclasses of tumor types with similar histopathologic profile but different clinical courses.Furthermore,such studies could help to define therapeutic sensitivity and to estimate prognosis of various cancers. Identification of gene expression profiles of cancer can identify new therapeutic targets or cancer susceptibility genes. The DNA-microarray technology may write a new chapter in molecular oncology.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Inhibition by arsenic trioxide of human hepatoma cell growth.

Arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) has been shown to be effective for treatment of patients with refractory or relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia and a variety of other malignant hematopoetic disorders. We studied the effect of this agent on proliferation of human hepatoma-derived cell lines (SK-Hep-1, HepG2, and HuH7). In HuH7 cells, As(2)O(3) reduced proliferation time- and dose-dependently at 1 and 2 microM, while in SK-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells, As(2)O(3) inhibited proliferation at 2 and 4 microM respectively. Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry showed that As(2)O(3) induced apoptosis in these hepatoma-derived cells as confirmed by appearance of sub-G(1) cells. Sensitivity of hepatoma-derived cells to As(2)O(3) was inversely related to their intracellular glutathione (GSH) and intensity of GSH synthesis. Arsenic sensitivity was restored to relatively resistant cell lines when GSH was depleted by L-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO). These results indicate that As(2)O(3) may have therapeutic potential for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Antineoplastic Agents↗