Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7786071

Building consensus for nephrology nursing practice.

L Smith·D Johnson·S Burrows-Hudson·A Keane
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Building consensus for nephrology nursing practice was the theme for the American Nephrology Nurses' Association's (ANNA's) 1994 Clinical Concerns Meetings in Chicago and LaJolla, California respectively. This article emphasizes the importance of consensus building, traditional approaches to consensus conferences, and the inherent risks in conducting such a conference. Additionally, the consensus conference design and steps leading to a final working document are presented by members of the Clinical Concerns Planning Committee.

Explore related subjects

Consensus Statements as TopicHumansNephrologySpecialties, NursingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Smith, D Johnson, S Burrows-Hudson, A Keane. 1995. Building consensus for nephrology nursing practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7786071/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗