Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7762939

Quality data: what are they?

Abstract

Nowadays, quality has become a very important factor in almost all areas of endeavour. The data generated from tests for the assessment of potentially toxic chemicals is obviously no exception. It is necessary, therefore, that quality systems be developed to ensure that the data generated to support these tests are of good quality. An acceptable quality system should require that, where applicable, the tests be performed according to defined guidelines. Once defined guidelines have been identified for the type of test to be performed, it is then necessary to design a plan which describes how, when, where and by whom the data will be generated. If at all possible, the data should be generated according to written standard procedures which provide for the production of data to the same quality standard. The data should be generated and collected by properly trained staff using data collection systems (paper or electronic media) which ensure the accuracy, reliability and integrity of the data recorded. The data must then be recorded in such a way as to ensure that they are reported completely clearly and accurately. The report, whether it be in the form of scientific article, monograph or formal study report, should present the data in a consistent manner and allow for adequate reconstruction of the events which took place during the test. Finally, the report and the data supporting it should be verified to ensure that the test was carried out according to the relevant guidelines (if used), that the study plan was correctly followed and finally that all data were properly generated and accurately reported in the report.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V A Sforza. 1994. Quality data: what are they?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7762939/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Performance of the FearID earprint identification system.

The Forensic Ear Identification (FearID) research project was started in order to study the strength of evidence of earprints found on crime scenes. For this purpose, a sample of earprints from 1229 donors over three countries was collected. From each donor three left and three right earprints were gathered. On the one hand, operators denoted contours of the earprints to facilitate segmentation of the images, on the other anthropological specialists denoted anatomically specific locations. On the basis of this, methods for automated classification were developed and used for training of a system that classifies pairs of prints as 'matching' or 'non-matching'. Comparing lab quality prints, the system has an equal error rate of 4%. Starting from a reference database containing two prints per ear, hitlist behaviour is such that in 90% of all query searches the best hit is in the top 0.1% of the list. The results become less favourable (equal error rate of 9%) for print/mark comparisons.

Databases, Factual↗

Normal limits of ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated SPECT in clinically normal patients without cardiac events: a study based on the J-ACCESS database.

PURPOSE: Quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is known to have high accuracy and precision for measurement of the principal cardiac functional parameters. We hypothesised that normal values for EF and LV volumes may differ among nationalities, and that optimal threshold values specific to the study population are required. METHODS: Among 4,670 consecutively registered patients for a J-ACCESS (Japanese investigation regarding prognosis based on gated SPECT) study from 117 hospitals, a total of 268 (149 women, 119 men) were selected who had no baseline cardiac diseases and had experienced no cardiac events during the preceding 3-year period. A gated SPECT study was performed with 99mTc-tetrofosmin and analysed with Cedars Sinai Medical Center's quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software. The results in respect of ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and stroke volume (SV), and EDV, ESV and SV normalised by body surface area (EDVI, ESVI and SVI), were calculated and summarised to obtain normal limits. RESULTS: EF for women and men was 74 +/- 9% and 63 +/- 7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). EDV, ESV and SV were significantly smaller in women than in men. Based on multiple regressions for linear models, the primary and secondary predictors of EF, EDVI, ESVI were gender and age. By stepwise multiple regression analysis, a statistically significant third predictor for EDV, ESV, SV and SVI was body weight. No colinearity was found between age and body weight. Important factors for the studied Japanese population included a high incidence of small hearts in women and the relatively advanced age of the population (the mean age +/-SD was 64.1 +/- 10.0 years for women and 60.9 +/- 11.7 years for men). CONCLUSION: EF and volumes determined by gated SPECT with QGS were significantly affected by gender and age, with body weight as a third predictor for volumes. Moreover, the normal limits were so specific for the population studied that standards appropriate for the study in question should be utilised.

Databases, Factual↗