Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7755895

Memory and amnesia.

Abstract

Brain damage can cause several distinct disorders of explicit memory as well as several disorders of implicit memory. Organic amnesia is the best studied explicit memory disorder. It is a syndrome that can be caused by lesions in (a) the medial temporal lobes, (b) the midline diencephalon, or (c) the basal forebrain. It remains unresolved whether one or several functional deficits underlie the syndrome, how these deficits should be characterised, and what is the exact location of the causal lesions. There is good evidence that amnesics encode information normally so their deficit(s) must be of storage or retrieval processes. If storage is disrupted, then one would expect item-specific implicit memory for certain kinds of novel information to be disrupted in amnesics. Current evidence is unable to indicate conclusively whether or not this prediction is met mainly because indirect memory test performance depends on explicit as well as implicit memory. Storage deficits should also result in accelerated forgetting in amnesic patients. Studies are described which reveal accelerated loss of free recall, but not recognition, for stories and semantically organised word lists in amnesics at delays between 15 s and 10 min. This suggests that amnesia involves a storage deficit for complex contextual associations that possibly occurs in conjunction with one or more other functional deficits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R Mayes. 1995-01-23. Memory and amnesia.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)00120-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Electroconvulsive shock and lidocaine reveal rapid consolidation of spatial working memory in the water maze.

Head trauma leading to concussion and electroconvulsive shock (ECS) in humans causes amnesia for events that occurred shortly before the injury (retrograde amnesia). The present experiment investigated the amnesic effect of lidocaine and ECS in 25 rats trained on a working memory version of the Morris water task. Each day, the escape platform was moved to a new location; learning was evidenced by a decrease in the latency to find the platform from the first to the second trial. "Consolidation" of this newly encoded spatial engram was disrupted by bilateral inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus with 1 microliter of 4% lidocaine applied as soon as possible after the first trial. When trial 2 was given after recovery from the lidocaine (30 min after the injection), a normal decrease in latency indicated that the new engram was not disrupted. When trial 2 was given under the influence of lidocaine (5 min after injection), absence of latency decrease demonstrated both the success of the inactivation and the importance of hippocampus for the task. To examine the role of events immediately after learning, ECS (30 or 100 mA, 50 Hz, 1.2 sec) was applied 0 sec to 45 sec after a single escape to the new platform location. A 2-h delay between ECS and trial 2 allowed the effects of ECS to dissipate. ECS applied 45 sec or 30 sec after trial 1 caused no retrograde amnesia: escape latencies on trial 2 were the same as in control rats. However, ECS applied 0 sec or 15 sec after trial 1 induced clear retrograde amnesia: escape latencies on trial 2 were no shorter than on trial 1. It is concluded that the consolidation of a newly formed memory for spatial location can only be disrupted by ECS within 30 sec after learning.

Amnesia