Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7738734

Pediatric appendectomy.

R H Pearl·D A Hale·M Molloy·D C Schutt·D P Jaques
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define patterns of care and outcome for pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: A study was designed to evaluate all pediatric appendectomies performed in the 147 Department of Defense hospitals worldwide. Cases of nonincidental appendectomy were identified through discharge diagnoses and operative logs, and 98.6% of the charts were retrieved for review. All charts were abstracted, and data were entered into a 127-field database for analysis. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, ending January 1993, appendectomy was performed on 1,366 pediatric patients in the Department of Defense hospital system. The patients' median age was 12 years (range, 6 months to 18 years); 59% were male. The diagnosis was normal appendix for 157 patients (12%), acute nonperforated appendicitis for 930 (68%), and perforated appendicitis for 279 (20%). Age < or = 8 years was predictive (P < .001) of a higher rate of perforated appendicitis (33% v 18%) but was not predictive of normal pathology (13% v 11%). Female gender was associated with a significantly higher rate of normal pathology (17% v 8%; P < .001) but not of perforation (18% v 22%). Temperature elevation and right lower quadrant pain and tenderness did not clinically distinguish between diagnostic groups. Sixty-two percent of patients with a normal appendix had a white blood cell count of more than 10,000/mm3, as did 91% of patients with acute or perforated appendicitis. Those with perforated appendicitis received pre- and postoperative antibiotics, primarily ampicillin/gentamicin/clindamycin or Flagyl (41%), cefoxitin (34%), or Unasyn (15%). In 77% of this subgroup, intraoperative cultures were positive, with isolates for Escherichia coli (76%) Enterococcus (30%), Bacteroides (24%), and Pseudomonas (20%) predominating. There were no deaths. Major complications occurred in 1.2% of patients with acute appendicitis and in 6.4% of those with perforated appendicitis; there were no major complications in the group with normal appendectomies. The hospitalization period was more than 7 days for 1.6%, 40%, and 3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This large series, from a large number of hospitals, with multiple practitioners, can serve as a community standard for pediatric appendectomy in the 1990s.

Explore related subjects

Abdominal AbscessAdolescentAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyAppendicitisCellulitisChildChild, PreschoolDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfantIntestinal PerforationIntraoperative CareLaparoscopyMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePostoperative CareProspective StudiesRupture, SpontaneousSex FactorsJournal ArticleMulticenter Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Pearl, D A Hale, M Molloy, D C Schutt, D P Jaques. 1995. Pediatric appendectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90556-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Is it necessary to retrieve dropped gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND: An experimental study was planned to evaluate the effect of bile alone and bile in combination with gallstones on intraperitoneal adhesion and abscess formation in the peritoneal cavity of the rat. METHODS: One hundred Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to ten groups (n: 10). Groups 1-3 received a 1-ml intraperitoneal injection of saline, sterile bile, and infected bile. Groups 4-10 underwent a lower 5-mm midline abdominal incision. In groups 5, 7, and 9, a single gallstone (3-mm diameter) was placed in the right upper quadrant and injected with sterile saline, sterile bile, and infected bile, respectively. In groups 6, 8, and 10, four gallstones (3-mm diameter) were placed in the right upper quadrant together with sterile saline, sterile bile, and infected bile, respectively. Group 4 only underwent a 5-mm midline incision. All animals were sacrificed at the end of 4 weeks and the peritoneal cavity was carefully examined to investigate adhesions and abscess formation. The adhesions were graded according to Nair's gross pathologic grading of adhesions. The Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (KW) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No intraabdominal lesions were noted in groups 1-3. The adhesion score was increased by number of stone and infected bile (G4: 3, G5: 3, G6: 11, G7: 7, G8: 10, G9: 15, G10: 18). But there was only a significant difference between the groups that received sterile saline+single stone (G5) and that receiving infected bile+four stones (G10) (KW: 24.3 P < 0.05). There was abscess formation in three rats in group 9 and two in group 10. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, infected bile in combination with multiple stones increases the gross grading of adhesion and intraabdominal abscess formation. Thus, in cases with multiple stones and infected bile, the dropped stones should be retrieved and the peritoneal cavity should be copiously irrigated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1997

Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver associated with extrahepatic infection.

We present two cases that support an infectious cause of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver. Each patient had sepsis due to chronic abdominal abscesses, along with a liver mass. Both patients had exploratory celiotomy, and histologic examination of the liver mass revealed inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver. Evidence of a mixed bacterial/Actinomyces infection was noted in hepatic tissue sections in one patient, and Bacteroides caccae was cultured directly from the liver biopsy in the other patient. This is the first known report of bacteria being cultured from biopsy specimens of a hepatic pseudotumor and the only reported case of Actinomyces within a hepatic pseudotumor. Clinical and pathologic findings in these two cases indicate that an extrahepatic infectious source should be explored as a potential cause of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1997

Trial of electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution lavage in the treatment of peritonitis and intraperitoneal abscess.

Electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution is acidic water that contains active oxygen and active chlorine and possesses a redox potential. We performed peritoneal and abscess lavages with an electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution to treat 7 patients with peritonitis and intraperitoneal abscesses, who were seen in our department between December 1994 and April 1995. The underlying disease was duodenal ulcer perforation in 4 of these 7 patients and gastric ulcer perforation, acute enteritis, and intraperitoneal perforation of pyometrium in 1 patient each. Irrigation was performed twice a day. Microbiological studies of the paracentesis fluid were negative in 3 cases, and the irrigation period was 2-4 days. Anaerobic bacteria were isolated in 3 of the 4 positive cases (Bacteroides in 2, Prevotella in 1), and a fungus (Candida) was isolated in the remaining patient. The period of irrigation in these patients ranged from 9 to 12 days, but conversion to a microorganism negative state was observed in 3-7 days.

Abdominal Abscess↗