Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7736417

Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial.

R Acharya·R Wasserman·J Stevens·C Hinojosa
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The introduction of advanced imaging technologies has improved significantly the quality of medical care available to patients. Non-invasive imaging modalities allow a physician to make increasingly accurate diagnoses and render precise and measured modes of treatment. Current uses of imaging technologies include laboratory medicine, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, and diagnostic radiology. This paper provides an overview of most of the popular imaging modalities currently in clinical use. It is hoped that a general understanding of the modality from which an image is derived will help researchers in the subsequent analysis of the image data.

Explore related subjects

Angiography, Digital SubtractionDiagnostic ImagingElectromagnetic FieldsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingQuality of Health CareTomography, Emission-ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Acharya, R Wasserman, J Stevens, C Hinojosa. Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-6111(94)00043-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.

Digital coronary angiographic techniques are now widely used in many cardiac catheterization laboratories. However, the full potential of digital imaging technology remains to be achieved because of its enormous storage and exchange requirements. Compression of digital imaging data allows a reduction in the volume of data so that storage and transmission are more efficient and cost-effective. Three angiographers reviewed the original and compressed formats of 96 coronary angiographic sequences in a blinded fashion to assess coronary lesion severity. Compression was achieved using the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) standard, which resulted in a compression ratio of approximately 15:1. The original format was reviewed in a blinded fashion a second time to assess for intraobserver variability of similar formats. Lesion severity was graded in quartiles. Coronary stenosis >50% was considered "significant." In parallel, the reproducibility of quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) measurements of coronary artery dimensions was also evaluated. For the visual assessment of lesion severity in the compressed versus original formats, kappa=0.52, suggesting moderate agreement. When lesions were assessed as significant versus "insignificant," however, kappa=0.88, suggesting excellent agreement. In the 2 separate readings of the original data formats, kappa=0.44 for assessment of lesion severity by quartiles and kappa=0.72 for lesions assessed as significant versus insignificant. Analysis of the compressed versus original data sets using QCA resulted in an excellent correlation for the measurement of lesion severity (r=0.99). The correlation was equally strong when the original format was analyzed sequentially (r=0.98). Lossy JPEG (15:1) compression is a valid means for reducing storage and exchange requirements of coronary angiographic data. The variability in assessing lesion severity between the original and compressed formats is comparable to the reported variability in visual assessment of lesion severity in sequential analysis of cine film.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed1996

Quantification of volumetric coronary blood flow with dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND: As a solution to the well-documented problems associated with visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms, more physiological methods of assessing coronary artery stenosis are being investigated. Volumetric coronary blood flow (BF) can be a valuable aid in the analysis of functional significance of arterial obstruction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) of 15 anesthetized pigs (40 to 50 kg) was dissected free from the epicardium in its proximal portion, and a transmit-time ultrasound flow probe of the appropriate size was applied. A vascular occluder was positioned distal to the flow probe for flow adjustments. Contrast injections (2 to 4 mL/s for 3 seconds) were made into the left main coronary artery during image acquisition with a motion-immune dual-energy digital subtraction angiography (DE DSA) system. Tissue-suppressed energy-subtracted images were used to generate time-density curves. BF measurements were made in the LAD vascular bed with use of the time-density curve, with consideration that blood was momentarily replaced with contrast during the injection. In 19 comparisons, the mean BF, measured with the use of DE DSA, correlated extremely well with the mean ultrasound flow (DE DSA=0.90 ultrasound+3.10 mL/min, r=.96). Also, contrast injection increased the BF by an average of only 15% during the image-acquisition time interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate BF measurements can be made with motion-immune DE DSA. The BF measurements can be completed before the onset of significant changes in BF due to contrast injection. Furthermore, it is possible to make the BF measurements during routine coronary arteriography.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗