Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7696775

Whose back is it?

Abstract

This is a question that every nurse should consider as it could be a major factor in their nursing career. Indeed if training needs and education at all levels of the National Health Service are not reviewed and brought up to date, nursing could be heading for serious difficulties in the near future. Fortunately for nursing, the European Community has decided to bring manual lifting and handling to the forefront by issuing directives which they hope will 'harmonise health and safety standards throughout the European Community such that competitive advantage cannot be gained by lowering costs as a direct result of lowering standards'. The most important of these as far as nursing is concerned is Directive 90/269, especially articles three to four which state employers have 'an existing duty to prepare and revise as necessary and bring to the attention of their employees, a written Health and Safety Policy'. It also expects employers to provide equipment which will allow workers to avoid manual handling and to ensure that a full assessment of all manual lifting tasks is carried out prior to their commencement, whether there is a risk of injury or not to the employee.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I MacFarlane. 1995. Whose back is it?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7696775/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Pelvic floor relaxation--a condition with many names and uncertain criteria].

Pain in the pelvis and lower back appears to be becoming an increasing problem in Norway. The relation between pelvic pain and low back pain is unclear. In the literature a variety of designations, such as pelvic girdle relaxation, pelvic joint instability, posterior pelvic pain, peripartum pelvic pain etc. have been used as identifying labels. The condition(s?) seems to be culturally specific for the Nordic countries in particular. However, pelvic pain is also recognized in England, Holland and Australia, but seemingly unknown in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The article describes the current knowledge--focusing criteria, etiology, prevalence and nomenclature--and points to the need for systematic epidemiological and clinical investigations.

Back Pain

Observations on the pathomorphology of the thoracolumbar fascia in chronic mechanical back pain. A microscopic study.

STUDY DESIGN: Human tissue specimens were examined for the presence of neural end-organs under light and electron microscopy. OBJECTIVES: To define the innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia in problem back pain patients who have articular abnormality defined through pain-provocation discography or facet blocks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous investigators have defined the presence of innervation in control (no back pain) tissue specimens. METHODS: Tissue specimens were harvested during surgery from 24 back pain patients who had not undergone previous lumbar surgery. Specimens were fixed immediately in the operating room and later processed and studied under light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Structural and ultrastructural studies failed to identify specific neural end-organs in any of the specimens. Serendipidously, microscopic changes suggestive of ischemia or inflammation in this tissue were found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the thoracolumbar fascia may be deficiently innervated in problem back pain patients.

Back Pain