PubMed · 764938
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1976-02-07. Tudor Thomas.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/764938/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Recipients enrolled in the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies were retyped as part of a quality assurance program. Because the observed percentage of HLA-DR homozygosity on original typing was more than twice as high as expected from CCTS allele frequencies, the sample selected for retyping was heavily weighted with patients whose original typing identified fewer than two DR antigens. Retyping was performed in a different laboratory from the laboratory performing the original typing. For the 129 patients who were retyped, agreement between the original and retyping laboratories was 88% for HLA-A, 79% for HLA-B, and 55% for HLA-DR. When criteria was relaxed to consider only discrepancies involving readily identifiable antigens, the agreement improved to 95% for HLA-A, 91% for HLA-B, and 59% for HLA-DR. Identification of a second HLA-DR antigen on retyping when only one DR antigen had been identified on original typing was by far the most common form of disagreement. There were no significant differences in the amount of disagreement among the laboratories. Of special interest is that 50% of the discrepancies involved DR3, DR5, and/or DR6, which have structural similarities. Based on the results of the project, we recommend: (1) replicate testing for all DR typing; and (2) retyping using a second source of antiserum for all subjects having DR blanks.
The microsurgical processing of longterm preserved tissue is still a problem for lamellar and perforating keratoplasties. Advantages of donor tissue cut with rotortrephines versus manual trephines are presented. Optimal possibilities of examination and storage of donor tissue are explained. A lamellar microkeratome, an artificial anterior chamber for corneoscleral discs and a refractive workbench for non-freeze modification are shown.
The introduction of a new motorized trepan in ophthalmic surgery by Arthur v. Hippel in 1891 was a very important achievement. The corneal incision became much safer and the unintentional injury of the iris, the lens and the vitreous body could be avoided considerably. Following a statement on corneal grafting in the 2. part of the 19. century the development of the trepan, the technical data and the experiences and reactions of other ophthalmic surgeons are discussed. The innovations of Arthur v. Hippel were appreciated by the A. v. Gräfe-Prize of the Society of Ophthalmology/Heidelberg.