Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7572851

Equilibrium clarified.

W C Shellhart
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding the concept of equilibrium is crucial to understanding the mechanics of tooth movement. The purpose of this article is to clarify the concept of equilibrium. This concept is most clearly understood when the clinician focuses on the appliance. Understanding the forces acting to deform the appliance readily translates to knowledge of the forces acting on the teeth. Knowing the forces that act on the teeth allows the clinician to predict tooth movement more accurately.

Explore related subjects

AccelerationBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityHumansOrthodontic AppliancesOrthodontic BracketsOrthodontic WiresRotationStress, MechanicalSurface PropertiesToothTooth Movement TechniquesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W C Shellhart. 1995. Equilibrium clarified.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70037-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

The potential and limitations of utilising head impact injury models to assess the likelihood of significant head injury in infants after a fall.

The use of engineering principles in assessing head injury scenarios is of increasing significance in investigations into suspected child abuse. A fall scenario is often given as the history for a head injury to an infant. This paper addresses the basic engineering principles and factors to be considered when calculating the severity of a head impact after free-fall. The application of head injury models (HIMs) to ascertain the forces involved in childhood head injuries from impact is also discussed. Previous studies including Duhaime et al. [J. Neurosurg. 66 (1987) 409] and Nokes et al. [Forensic Sci. Int. 79 (1995) 85] have utilised HIMs for this purpose: this paper reviews those models most widely documented.The HIM currently considered the 'state-of-the-art' is the head injury criterion (HIC) and it is suggested that this model should be utilised for assessing head impact injury in child abuse cases where appropriate.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

The response of human volunteers to rear-end impacts: the effect of head restraint properties.

STUDY DESIGN: Human volunteers were subjected to a rear-end impact while sitting on a standard automobile seat, and sagittal plane kinematic responses were quantified. The effect of changing head restraint properties was determined by use of a repeated measures design. OBJECTIVE: To determine the forces acting, and relative motions resulting, on volunteers in a rear-end impact and the effect of head restraint properties. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In several recent studies of the kinematics of the cervical spine during rear-end impact, a forward thrust to the lower cervical spine was produced, and a transient S shape of the spine resulted while the head remained upright during the initial phase of the impact. This may result in nonphysiologic intervertebral motions and tissue strains. METHODS: Nineteen automobile seats were first tested, and a modified head restraint was designed. Each volunteer sitting on a standard vehicle seat was subjected to an impact pulse of 3g with a 4-kph speed change. Testing was performed first with the modified head restraint, then again after replacement by the head restraint that came with the seat. Kinematic responses were compared for both head restraints by use of a repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a measurable time difference between peak chest and peak head accelerations, which resulted in the chest being thrust forward by the seat back before the head was thrust forward by the head restraint. The modified head restraint significantly reduced the contact time difference and therefore decreased the relative chest-to-head forward motion. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteers seated on a standard automobile seat demonstrated differential sagittal plane motion between the chest and head. It is possible to significantly decrease the relative chest-to-head motion by altering the characteristics of the head restraint.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2001

Compensation for the effects of head acceleration on jaw movement in speech.

Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of subjects to adjust the control of limb movements to counteract the effects of self-generated loads. The degree to which subjects change control signals to compensate for these loads is a reflection of the extent to which forces affecting movement are represented in motion planning. Here, we have used empirical and modeling studies to examine whether the nervous system compensates for loads acting on the jaw during speech production. As subjects walk, loads to the jaw vary with the direction and magnitude of head acceleration. We investigated the patterns of jaw motion resulting from these loads both in locomotion alone and when locomotion was combined with speech production. In locomotion alone, jaw movements were shown to vary systematically in direction and magnitude in relation to the acceleration of the head. In contrast, when locomotion was combined with speech, variation in jaw position during both consonant and vowel production was substantially reduced. Overall, we have demonstrated that the magnitude of load associated with head acceleration during locomotion is sufficient to produce a systematic change in the position of the jaw. The absence of variation in jaw position during locomotion with speech is thus consistent with the idea that in speech, the control of jaw motion is adjusted in a predictive manner to offset the effects of head acceleration.

Acceleration↗