Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7567558

Basic facts.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Carlisle. Basic facts.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7567558/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Management of small fragment wounds: experience from the Afghan border.

Fragmenting munitions have caused the majority of casualties in recent conflicts. These wounds are often multiple, many affecting only the soft tissues of the extremities. The management of these wounds is controversial; some surgeons advocate aggressive surgical treatment; others believe that a nonoperative policy is appropriate in selected cases. The International Committee of the Red Cross has a great deal of experience in treating the wounds of war. It maintains a war surgery hospital in Pakistan, close to the Afghan border, receiving wounded from the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan. This paper describes the number, distribution, and severity of more than 1200 fragment wounds. These injuries were sustained by 83 casualties who presented to the hospital during a recent flare-up in the fighting. The majority of these fragment wounds affected the limbs. Small-fragment wounds affecting only the skin and muscle were managed nonoperatively, with antibiotics and dressings. More than 850 wounds were managed in this way. There were complications in only two of the 63 casualties who had wounds that were treated nonoperatively. The complications were localized abscesses, one of which required surgical drainage. The policy of carefully assessing the wounds and treating selected wounds conservatively appears to have been both successful, in terms of saved surgical resources, and safe, with no life- or limb-threatening complications. This paper makes recommendations as to which wounds might be suitable for nonoperative management, but acknowledges that further work is needed to define the optimal treatment of these common wounds.

Afghanistan

Treatment plan used for vascular injuries in the Afghanistan war.

The outcome of 961 patients with vascular injuries received in the Afghanistan war is reported. Some 755 (78.6%) patients had to have a primary amputation while only 206 (20.9%) had restorative surgery. The vessels were simply ligated in 85 cases and reconstructive surgery was performed in 121. Ligation resulted in 46 (54%) cases of limb salvage and functional restoration; 30 (35%) went on to amputation and nine (11%) died. Of the 121 patients treated by reconstructive surgery, 83 (68.5%) had completely patent vessels, 19 (15.7%) collateral compensation, 13 (10.7%) proceeded to subsequent amputation and six (4.9%) died. Although the location of the injury and the duration of the ischaemic period are important in deciding how to treat the vascular injuries of war, the decisive factor appears to be the pre-existing severity of regional ischaemia.

Afghanistan