Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7560579

Dental implants.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Masters, H Tatum. 1995. Dental implants.. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Fluctuations in the number and distribution of prosthodontists: 1987-1995.

PURPOSE: This article presents a review that used three ADA studies on the distribution of dentists to determine whether the number of private practice prosthodontists in the mid 1990s has kept pace with the population in the various regions and states. RESULTS: Findings indicate that between 1987 and 1991 there was a marked national increase in numbers of prosthodontists followed by a marked decrease during the first half of the 1990s. There continued to be major differences, however, in practitioner-to-population ratios in different geographic areas. Since the mid 1980s, there has been a general increase in the number of graduates from prosthetic programs, but an increasing percentage of these graduates were foreign trained dentists. CONCLUSION: There continues to be a need to determine the adequacy of the number and distribution of prosthodontists.

American Dental Association

Changing number and distribution of orthodontists: 1987-1995.

A review of the 1995 and earlier American Dental Association studies on the distribution of dentists provides specific information in the evolving numbers of orthodontists at the national, regional, and state levels. During the 1990s, the number of orthodontists decreased at the national level and in 22 states, whereas the number of orthodontists per population of youngsters decreased in 41 states. Previous projections on the potential decreasing ratio of orthodontists-to-population appear to be borne out.

American Dental Association

In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.

The solubility of resin luting cement remains unknown although the use of resin luting cement for routine cementation of restorations has increased. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the solubilities of three resin cements currently in clinical use with three brands of conventional luting agents. The three resin luting cements, All-Bond C&B (AB, Bisco) Panavia 21 (P21, Kuraray), and Super-Bond C&B (SB, Sun-Medical), and the three conventional luting agents, Elite Cement 100 (EC, zinc phosphate cement, GC), HY-Bond Carbo-plus Cement (HCP, polycarboxylate cement, Shofu), and Fuji I (FI, glass-ionomer cement, GC) were used in this study. A modification of the ADA specification test was adopted to evaluate the solubilities of luting cements. The two types of media (distilled water and pH 4.0 lactic acid solution) in which specimens were stored for 30 days were prepared. The four luting cements, EC, FI, AB, and P21, were more soluble in lactic acid solution than in distilled water. Resin luting cements were markedly less soluble than conventional luting agents when placed in fresh lactic acid solution (0.001 mol/L) at pH 4.0 every 24 h over a 30-day period. The solubility rates of luting cements could be fitted to mathematical expressions which indicated that the solubilities increased linearly or logarithmically with immersion period. Fixed prosthodontic restorations cemented with resin luting cement may be capable of withstanding long-term clinical use compared with conventional luting agents.

American Dental Association