Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7554865

Development, implementation and a first evaluation of a protocol processing system (ProtoVIEW).

Abstract

In this contribution the protocol information system ProtoVIEW is presented. The system provides the necessary information to physicians about diagnostic procedures and therapies. It is implemented as a stand alone system. The design criteria are discussed and the results of a first evaluation presented. It appears that interns can easily find the required information with the help of the system. The time that they need for accessing the relevant information is relatively short (about 1 min). The users expressed the opinion that the system is easy to use and does support them in the management of their patients. On the basis of this evaluation and evaluations reported elsewhere it is concluded (a) that stand-alone protocol systems can support daily patient management in a positive way and (b) that the design criteria for a protocol information system as presented in this paper are useful for prospective protocol information system developers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Vissers, A Hasman, H H Donkers, C J vd Linden. 1995. Development, implementation and a first evaluation of a protocol processing system (ProtoVIEW).. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01631-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

General practitioner attitudes to case conferences: how can we increase participation and effectiveness?

OBJECTIVES: To identify general practitioners' views on the barriers to using case conferencing (as outlined in the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Enhanced Primary Care package) and to develop a set of principles to encourage greater GP participation in case conferences. DESIGN: Qualitative study, involving semistructured questions administered to focus groups of GPs, conducted between April and July 2001 as part of a broader study of case coordination in palliative care. PARTICIPANTS: 29 GPs from urban, regional, and rural areas of Queensland. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Many of the GPs' work practices militated against participation in traditionally structured case conferences. GPs thought the range of MBS item numbers should be expanded to cover alternative methods of liaison (eg, phone consultations with other service providers). The onerous bureaucratic processes required to claim reimbursement were an additional disincentive. CONCLUSIONS: GPs would probably be more likely to participate in case conferences if they were initiated by specialist services and arranged more flexibly to suit GP work schedules.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗