Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7492037

Using the "GI cocktail": a descriptive study.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine practice patterns regarding administration of the "GI cocktail" (a mixture of liquid antacid, viscous lidocaine, and an anticholinergic) in the emergency department in a single hospital and the responses and final dispositions of patients who received the cocktails. DESIGN: A retrospective review of ED charts. SETTING: Urban university hospital ED with an annual census of 50,000 visits. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients who received a GI cocktail in the ED. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (50%) received a GI cocktail for a chief complaint of abdominal pain and 40 (41%) for a chief complaint of chest pain. The reason for administration of a GI cocktail was documented on only one chart. Sixty-six patients (68%) received at least one other drug, at a median time of 9 minutes before administration of the GI cocktail. The most commonly coadministered drug was a narcotic (56 patients), followed by nitroglycerin (22 patients), antiemetics (13 patients), H2-blockers (13 patients), and aspirin (10 patients). Thirty-three patients (34%) had symptomatic relief with the cocktail alone, 35 (36%) had symptomatic relief with the cocktail plus other drugs, 7 (7%) had no response to the GI cocktail alone, and 5 (5%) had no response to the cocktail with other drugs. In 17 patients (18%) the response was not documented. Chest pain patients and abdominal pain patients had a similar frequency of response. There was also similarity of response between admitted and discharged patients. CONCLUSION: Although symptomatic relief after administration of a GI cocktail is often noted, it is difficult to differentiate the effects of the cocktail from those of other coadministered medications such as morphine or nitroglycerin. We urge ED physicians to use the GI cocktail in a rational manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Wrenn, C M Slovis, J Gongaware. 1995. Using the "GI cocktail": a descriptive study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70038-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection.

BACKGROUND: Currently, screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended for the general population. Targeting women with specific symptoms for screening has been evaluated only recently, because it was believed that symptoms had limited specificity. METHODS: A case-control study of 149 women with ovarian cancer, including 255 women who were in a screening program and 233 women who were referred for pelvic/abdominal ultrasound, was conducted by inviting women to complete a survey of symptoms. Patients were divided randomly into an exploratory group and a confirmatory group. Symptom types, frequency, severity, and duration were compared between cases and controls. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine which factors independently predicted cancer in the exploratory group and then were used to develop a symptom index, which was tested for sensitivity and specificity in the confirmatory group. RESULTS: Symptoms that were associated significantly with ovarian cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain, urinary urgency/frequency, increased abdominal size/bloating, and difficulty eating/feeling full when they were present for <1 year and occurred >12 days per month. In a logistic regression analysis, symptoms that were associated independently with cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain (P < .001), increased abdominal size/bloating (P<.001), and difficulty eating/feeling full (P = .010). A symptom index was considered positive if any of those 6 symptoms occurred >12 times per month but were present for <1 year. In the confirmatory sample, the index had a sensitivity of 56.7 for early-stage disease and 79.5% for advanced-stage disease. Specificity was 90% for women age >50 years and 86.7% for women age <50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Specific symptoms in conjunction with their frequency and duration were useful in identifying women with ovarian cancer. A symptom index may be useful for identifying women who are at risk.

Abdominal Pain↗

[Nonocclusive ischemia of the right colon].

BACKGROUND: Nonocclusive disease (NOD) is known to be a common cause of ischemic colitis, which is frequently underestimated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A computer-assisted search of radiological reports at our institute over a period of 18 months, describing ischemic colitis of the ascending colon with an unimpaired perfusion of the superior mesenteric artery, was performed. RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical and radiological data of 14 patients was performed. In ten cases colonic ischemia was confirmed clinically or intraoperatively. Most of our patients needed intravenous catecholamines due to severe hypotension. However, no significant radiographic predictors could be identified. CONCLUSION: Awareness of NOD seems to be crucial. Especially in cases of acute abdominal pain associated with severe hypotension, renal insufficiency, or pancreatitis, one should include NOD as a differential diagnosis at an early stage.

Abdominal Pain↗