Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7481735

Questionnaire based exposure assessment methods.

Abstract

In environmental epidemiological studies, questionnaires may be the method of choice for assessing exposure because no other source of information is available, or because they provide the most efficient study design, allowing a larger study size and greater statistical power than would be possible with other more accurate measurement techniques. Problems may arise from a lack of content validity (the questionnaire does not cover all sources of exposure to the hazard of interest) or criterion validity (e.g., through inaccurate recall or misunderstanding of questions). Methods for validating questionnaires are described. The usefulness of validated 'standard' questionnaires is discussed, particularly in regard to comparison of exposure patterns in various populations studied separately. It is stressed that the validity of standard questionnaires should not be automatically assumed when they are applied to populations other than those in which they have been tested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Coggon. 1995-06-16. Questionnaire based exposure assessment methods.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04621-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hepatitis A: post-exposure prophylaxis.

We report on the findings of an exploratory review of evidence published in English from 1945 to identify the best post-exposure prophylaxis treatment and the longest acceptable interval after exposure for prophylaxis to be effective. We found no evidence that post-exposure administration of currently available immunoglobulins is effective in preventing hepatitis A infection and disease. The use of immunoglobulins for immunoprophylaxis should not be widely recommended until a systematic review of the evidence has been conducted. We recommend that active immunization to secondary contacts of exposed and vaccinated subjects be offered.

Environmental Exposure↗

Prioritisation of veterinary medicines in the UK environment.

A wide range of veterinary medicines is used to treat animals in the UK. Whilst the environmental impact of selected substances (particulary the sheep dip chemicals, anthelmintics and fish farm chemicals) has been well studied, limited information is available in the public domain on the other groups of substances (e.g. antifungals, coccidiostats, antiprotozoals, hormones and growth promoters). There is therefore a need to identify other substances that may impact the environment in order to design national monitoring programmes, target experimental work and develop pollution prevention methodologies. In this study, a simple two-stage prioritisation scheme was developed and applied to veterinary medicines in use in the UK. In the first stage, those substances that have high potential to enter the environment in significant amounts were identified on the basis of amounts used in the UK, treatment type and metabolism. In stage 2, the hazard of the identified substances to terrestrial and aquatic organisms was assessed. Using the approach, a total of 56 substances or groups were assigned to a 'high priority' category. For eleven of these substances, sufficient data were available to characterise their risk, these were: oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, tetracycline, sulphadiazine, amoxicillin, diazinon, tylosin, dihydrostreptomycin, apramycin, cypermethrin and sarafloxicin. For the remaining 45 substances, full datasets were not available and it is recommended that in the first instance, attempts are made to fill these data gaps.

Environmental Exposure↗