Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7413385

Intermodal organization: a methodological localization study.

Abstract

The nature of organization among vision, right hand, and left hand was studied. A target was presented to one of the three modalities, and a response was required by one of the other two modalities. Constant errors from the resulting six conditions were examined to determine whether the three modalities function as an organized system, such that the relation between two modalities may be predicted from the relations of each of the two with the third. Predictions were correct in direction but incorrect in magnitude. The data also were analyzed to bear on the usually implicit assumption in research on localization that a response modality has consistent error characteristics regardless of the nature of the target being localized. It was concluded that such assumptions may not be valid.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D H Warren, T L Schmitt. 1980. Intermodal organization: a methodological localization study.. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.50.3c.1111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multiple mechanisms for the detection of mirror symmetry.

Symmetry detection was investigated for static and dynamic noise targets consisting of a field of approximately 0.3 million random dots on which was imposed a bilateral symmetry. The minimum duration for detection was 40 ms for static and 80 ms for dynamic symmetry. The exponents of the psychometric functions averaged about 4 for both static and dynamic tasks, as opposed to the value of 1 expected for such suprathreshold tasks, implying that there is some neural mechanism performing full temporal integration of the symmetry information up to durations of a second or more. Static symmetry was perceivable when information around the symmetry axis was masked up to 3 deg away from the symmetry axis, revealing extrafoveal symmetry detection in approximately 300 ms exposures. The static data were fitted with a model consisting of three mechanisms with Gaussian spatial profiles and mutual inhibition (two mechanisms were sufficient for the dynamic data). The profile of the widest mechanism was 20 times wider for static than for dynamic symmetry.

Dominance, Cerebral