Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7363529

Informed consent 1980.

Abstract

The right of a patient, in most cases, to have the final authority to consent to a treatment, operation, or diagnostic procedure is guaranteed by 200 years of legal precedent. The right of that same patient to be adequately informed so that the decision is entirely his or her own seems to be equally well protected. It is unlikely that the medical profession can find a mechanical solution to the problem. That intangible patient-physician relationship must be developed to the point where there is a true interchange of the same information a physician would use to consent to undergo such a procedure or agree to it for a loved one. Finally, the physicians must decide, on the basis of their experience, the literature, personal attorney input, and other sources, the best method of documenting that moment when truly informed consent has been obtained.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R S Brittain. 1980. Informed consent 1980.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-198003000-00017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis.

Conflicts between physicians and families about end-of-life decisions create challenging and emotionally difficult situations. In this article, we propose a "differential diagnosis" of such conflicts, distinguishing and describing the characteristics of families, physicians, and organizations and society that contribute to the "etiology" of the situation, as well as strategies for "diagnosing" the dominant factors. As a medical model, the differential diagnosis can be a useful tool to help physicians understand and manage conflicts about end-of-life care.

Comprehension

Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk.

Virtually every course of medical action is associated with some adverse risk to the patient. Discussing these risks with patients is a fundamental duty of physicians both to fulfill a role as trusted adviser and to promote the ethical principle of autonomy (particularly as embodied in the doctrine of informed consent). Discussing medical risk is a difficult task to accomplish appropriately. Challenges stem from gaps in the physician's knowledge about pertinent risks, uncertainty about how much and what kind of information to communicate, and difficulties in communicating risk information in a format that is clearly understood by most patients. For example, a discussion of the risk of undergoing a procedure should be accompanied by a discussion of the risk of not undergoing a procedure. This article describes basic characteristics of risk information, outlines major challenges in communicating risk information, and suggests several ways to communicate risk information to patients in an understandable format. Ultimately, a combination of formats (eg, qualitative, quantitative, and graphic) may best accommodate the widely varying needs, preferences, and abilities of patients. Such communication will help the physician accomplish the fundamental duty of teaching the patient the information necessary to make an informed and appropriate decision.

Comprehension