PubMed · 7362996
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I A Goulbourne, J Rainey, C V Ruckley. 1980-02-09. Day-bed units.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.280.6211.404-b
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Needlescopic inguinal hernioplasty has been made feasible with the miniaturization of instruments and recent advances in laparoscopic surgical technique. Postoperative outcome of needlescopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) has not been previously compared with that of conventional TEPs. The objective of the current study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of needlescopic and conventional TEPs. METHODS: From March 1, 2001, to December 30, 2001, a total of 30 patients underwent attempted unilateral needlescopic TEPs. Of these, 12 and 18 patients underwent ambulatory and inpatient procedures, respectively. The results were compared to those of an age-matched cohort of 30 patients who underwent either ambulatory (n = 12) or inpatient (n = 18) conventional TEPs. All data were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Needlescopic TEPs were successfully performed in 90% of patients (n = 27). Three procedures were converted to conventional TEPs because of adhesions. Demographic features, hernia types, and mean operative times of the two groups were similar. The mean pain score upon coughing on postoperative day 1 was significantly lower in patients who underwent needlescopic TEPs than in those who had conventional TEPs. Pain scores at rest and upon coughing on days 0 to 6 were otherwise comparable between the two groups. Comparisons of the mean duration of hospitalization, postoperative morbidity, and time taken to resume normal activities showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Needlescopic TEP is a safe technique for the repair of inguinal hernia. Postoperative recovery following needlescopic and conventional TEPs was similar. Needlescopic TEP conferred a significantly lower pain score upon coughing on the first day after operation.
Ingrown toenail is a common problem resulting from various etiologies including improperly trimmed nails, hyperhidrosis, and poorly fitting shoes. Patients commonly present with pain in the affected nail but with progression, drainage, infection, and difficulty walking occur. Excision of the lateral nail plate combined with lateral matricectomy is thought to provide the best chance for eradication. The lateral aspect of the nail plate is removed with preservation of the remaining healthy nail plate. Electrocautery ablation is then used to destroy the exposed nail-forming matrix, creating a new lateral nail fold. Complications of the procedure include regrowth of a nail spicule secondary to incomplete matricectomy and postoperative nail bed infection. When performed correctly, the procedure produces the greatest success in the treatment of ingrown nails. Basic soft tissue surgery and electrosurgery experience are prerequisites for learning the technique.
OBJECTIVE: To determine current practice regarding removal of endometrial polyps. STUDY DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire to all 1509 UK consultant gynaecologists to enquire about their current practice and potential willingness to participate in a randomised trial. RESULTS: Treatment methods varied considerably. Inpatient polypectomy was used by 91% and the favoured method was blind removal of polyp following hysteroscopic localisation (53%). Direct hysteroscopic polypectomy was more commonly performed by 46% members of endoscopic societies compared to 33% of non-members. Outpatient polypectomy was performed by 19% of users of outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy compared to 2.5% of non-users. One-third of respondents were willing to enter patients into a randomised controlled trial to determine the optimal intrauterine polyp removal technique. CONCLUSION: Opinion regarding the relative roles of inpatient or outpatient, and blind or hysteroscopic methods, is divided and a randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of these methods is practicable.