Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7277061

Visual form perception and the spatial phase transfer function.

G J Burton·I R Moorhead
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The quality of many imaging devices can be characterized, within certain constraints, by means of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the phase transfer function (PTF). In many cases, it is possible to estimate, qualitatively, the effect of the MTF on the appearance of objects, and much progress has been made in making quantitative predictions of the detectability of objects and features within objects. This is not the case, however, for the PTF, and its influence is often neglected, even though nonideal PTF's obviously may degrade image quality. Experiments are described that attempt to assess the significance of the PTF for human visual performance. The effects of various PTF's were simulated by means of a technique that maintained the modulation of the spatial-frequency components closely constant. The visual detectability of such phase changes was measured by a discrimination method, and phase threshold levels were evaluated. Simple linear patterns provided the targets for all measurements, although some images are shown that illustrate qualitatively the phase-shift results on real two-dimensional targets. The work enables an assessment to be made of the effects of phase changes produced by various imaging systems.

Explore related subjects

Form PerceptionHumansVisual PerceptionJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J Burton, I R Moorhead. 1981. Visual form perception and the spatial phase transfer function.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.71.001056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding.

What are the elementary features that the brain uses to bind spatially distinct parts in a visual scene into an unitary percept of an "object"? The Gestalt psychologists emphasized the extent to which motion, colour, luminance or spatial arrangement contribute towards object formation. Little is known about the role of time per se, rather than motion, in constituting an object. In particular, does the visibility or saliency of an object change if the various parts making up the object are not presented simultaneously? Using a simple experimental design, we show that very small spatial displacements can significantly influence the saliency of an object while large temporal asynchrony has no significant effect.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1995

Object representation by cores: identifying and representing primitive spatial regions.

We propose a model of the spatial visual processes underlying the identification and representation of the shape of primitive spatial regions. We propose that a region's boundaries are sensed at multiple scales by boundariness detectors that give graded responses, that stimulated boundariness detectors of similar scale, sigma, connect to one another across a distance that is proportional to their scale, and that they connect via cores, where a core encodes the middles and widths of the region and hence is a trace in (chi, gamma, sigma), i.e. 3-D scale space.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1995

Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion.

When a wheel rolls along a flat surface, a point on its perimeter traces a cycloid trajectory, forming a sequence of adjacent semicircle-like scallops. However, when mentally visualizing this point's trajectory, participants erroneously describe the point's path as looping back on itself between each scallop or phase of the cycloid, a phenomenon called the curtate cycloid illusion. The studies supported the hypothesis that the curtate cycloid illusion occurs because the cognitive system sometimes does not have sufficient resources for simultaneously processing 2 components of the motion: its translation and its rotation about its current instant center. Four experiments using computer-animated rolling wheels found that participants who were high in spatial ability were less susceptible to the curtate cycloid illusion than were low-spatial participants, that high-spatial participants were not susceptible to the illusion if they could control the animated wheel display, and that the illusion was substantially decreased if the opportunity to compute instant centers was reduced.

Form Perception↗