PubMed · 7243155
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Diebenow. 1981. Problem-solving with working mothers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7243155/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Reduction of personnel by businesses and other organisations (organisational downsizing) is common in Europe, but little is known about its effects on the health of employees. METHODS: We used employers' records to investigate the relation between downsizing and subsequent absenteeism because of ill health in 981 local-government workers who remained in employment in Raisio, south-western Finland, during a period of economic decline (1991-95). Data were separated into three time periods: 1991, before downsizing; 1993, major downsizing in some workplaces and occupations; and 1993-95, after downsizing. We obtained data on sick leave from records kept by the occupational health-care unit in Raisio. We also investigated whether the effects of downsizing were dependent on ten other predictors of sick leave. FINDINGS: There was a significant association between downsizing and medically certified sick leave. The rate of absenteeism was 2.3 times greater (95% CI 2.0-2.7) after major downsizing, classified by occupation, than after minor downsizing. The corresponding rate ratios for musculoskeletal disorders and trauma were 5.7 (4.1-8.0) and 2.7 (1.7-4.2), respectively. The effects of downsizing by workplace depended on the age distribution of the staff. When the proportion of employees who were older than 50 years was high, downsizing increased the individual risk of absence because of ill health by 3.2-14.0 times, depending on diagnostic category. When the proportion of employees over 50 years was low, downsizing had only slight effects on health. Other risk factors that increased rates of sick leave after downsizing were age over 44 years, a large workplace, poor health before downsizing, and high income. INTERPRETATION: Downsizing is a risk to the health of employees. But this risk varies according to individual factors, such as age, socioeconomic status, and health, as well as factors related to place of work, for example, size and age structure of the staff.
Acute low back injuries are described in a cohort of about 31,000 material handlers employed in all Home Depot, Inc., retail stores in California from 1990 through 1994. With over 87 million work hours, incidence density rates, rate ratios, and confidence intervals are given by age, sex, length of employment, and job-lifting requirements. Injuries are further described by lost work days, activity at time of injury, work restrictions, and time frames. The unadjusted low back injury rate per million work hours was 1.6 times higher for men compared with women, and rates were highest for those less than 25 years of age, those with less than 2 years of current job experience, and employees with the greatest materials lifting and handling job requirements. These findings in unadjusted rates and rate ratios persisted when each was adjusted through a Poisson regression model, with the exception of sex. The adjusted risk ratio for males was reversed with significantly higher risk in females when the rate ratio was adjusted for age, lifting intensity, and length of job experience. Injuries were most commonly associated with lifting activities and, while injury occurrence was highest from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., rates were greatest during those hours when the store was closed to retail activities. Merchandise stocking that requires heavy and frequent materials handling is done during these hours. Fewer injuries than expected were reported on weekends, days with considerably less materials handling activities.
STUDY DESIGN: Review of a trial of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity and results of the study, and their applicability to and influence on current clinical practice and recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although bed rest has been a cornerstone of treatment for acute low back pain, historically this recommendation was largely based on "expert opinion." In 1986, Deyo et al. published a randomized study of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain. Despite results from this and other studies, current clinical practice and treatment recommendations continue to overemphasize bed rest. METHODS: The study was reviewed using structured criteria adopted from the medical literature that focus on the validity of the study design, the results of the treatment, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were randomized to 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest. Groups were similar at baseline evaluation. Outcomes assessed at 3 and 12 weeks were similar between groups, except that patients receiving a recommendation for 2 days of bed rest had significantly fewer days of work absence than those recommended 7 days. Limitations of the study included poor compliance with recommended bed rest, especially in the 7-day group, a marginal sample size without information on relevant confidence intervals, and patient characteristics that may have affected the generalizability of these findings to others with acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, this study provided strong evidence that less bed rest was associated with similar outcomes for acute low back pain along with quicker return to work. Results from this and other studies support a shift away from bed rest as a primary recommendation in the initial management of low back pain. In spite of this, bed rest recommendations for episodes of low back pain remain common. Additional efforts are needed to change clinical practice.