Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7226855

Grammatical decision time and visual hemifield stimulation.

Abstract

An experiment was performed to study grammatical decision time to three-letter Hebrew verbs and nouns presented to the right or to the left visual hemifield. Decision time was measured by the subject's manual response involving the movement of the index finger from the middle one of three electronic contact keys, to the right key to indicate the appearance of a verb, and to the left key to indicate the appearance of a noun. A comparison was also made of two response conditions, right hand responding versus left hand responding. The results indicate a greater number of errors in responding to verbs than to nouns, but no difference in accuracy between right visual field (RVF) stimulation and left visual field (LVF) stimulation. In contrast, the results indicate that grammatical decision time to Hebrew verbs is shorter than to nouns for all conditions of stimulation and response. Decision time to verbs appearing in the right visual field (RVF) is shorter than to verbs appearing in the left visual field (LVF). Consequently, the difference in decision time between verbs and nouns is greater for RVF stimulation than for LVF stimulation. There is no difference in decision time for stimulation of the RVF or LVF by nouns. Responding hand also does not affect grammatical decision time to either verbs or nouns in either RVF or LVF stimulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Babkoff, Y Ben-Uriah, S Eliashar. 1980. Grammatical decision time and visual hemifield stimulation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(80)80005-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗