Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7219385

Impotence--pathogenesis and evaluation.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A D Smith, P H Lange. 1980. Impotence--pathogenesis and evaluation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7219385/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer is a known potential complication of the surgery. Because prostate cancer is diagnosed today more frequently than in the past and because the diagnosis is made in increasingly younger men, there is an urgent need to develop effective interventions that preserve erectile function after surgery. In this presentation, a 51-year-old man with adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, after which he lost natural erectile function for approximately 9 months. The case highlights the fact that following surgery in which the nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy technique is used, between 60% to 85% of men eventually recover erectile function. This constitutes a dramatic improvement over an earlier era, when postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction was the nearly universal rule. The case also emphasizes that despite expert application of the nerve-sparing prostatectomy technique, early recovery of natural erectile function is uncommon. Many patients experience erectile dysfunction for as long as 2 years after the procedure, requiring the use of erectile aids for sexual activity during this period until natural erections recover. Corrective, cause-specific advances such as neuromodulatory therapy offer valuable adjuncts to this surgery.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

[Sensitivity to change and minimally important difference of the Spanish version of the life-satisfaction questionnaire LISAT-8 in male patients with erectile dysfunction].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We determined the sensitivity to change and minimally important difference (MID) of the Spanish version of the life-satisfaction check list LISAT-8. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We included a random sample obtained from an open, naturalistic, prospective and multicenter study, which assessed the effectiveness of sildenafil as erectile dysfunction (ED) therapy. A total of 537 patients, males older than 18 years, with ED and > active sexual desire, received flexible and at demand doses of sildenafil for 10 weeks. IIEF and LISAT-8 questionnaires were used. MID was determined from the patient's classification according to change in erectile function domain of the IIEF after treatment as follows: no change (< 5 pts), small change (6 to 10 pts), moderate change (11 to 15 pts) and big change (> 15 pts). RESULTS: Sildenafil significantly modified the baseline punctuation of the LISAT 8 from a crude value of 30.2 (5.9) pts (mean [standard deviation]), at baseline, to 34.7 (5.6) pts after treatment., and from 55.4% (14.7%) to 66.8% (14.3%) in standardized punctuation (p < 0.0001 in both cases). Sildenafil responders showed a response increase of the total punctuation which was significantly higher than non-responders: 12.5% versus 4.3% (p < 0.001). MID was 3.2 pts as crude punctuation, and 8.1% in normalized score. Statistically significant correlations were found between changes in LISAT-8 and changes in IIEF. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the LISAT-8 showed to be responsive to change in male ED patients. Meaningful MID was 3.1 pts (crude) and 8.1% (normalized).

Erectile Dysfunction↗