Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7162310

Auditory distortion.

D Reiter
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The auditory system responds to pulsatile energy flow from the environment. Compression and rarefaction of gaseous molecular mass is transduced into electromechanical forms, in order to produce an effect at the cortical level. For energy input to have consistent meaning, transduction must preserve information coded within the pattern of energy flow. Distortion, or alteration of the original form, occurs in many ways throughout the chain of generation/transmission/reception/interpretation. Parameters of energy flow are discussed, and distortion of each parameter is presented in a context which permits the development of a distortion-based analysis of common clinical problems in otolaryngology.

Explore related subjects

AcousticsAuditory PerceptionHearing DisordersHumansLoudness PerceptionMusicPerceptual DistortionPitch PerceptionSoundSpeech AcousticsVocal Cord ParalysisJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Reiter. 1982. Auditory distortion.. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.1982.92.2.150

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

Optimal coating selection for the analysis of organic vapor mixtures with polymer-coated surface acoustic wave sensor arrays.

A method for determining the optimal set of polymer sensor coatings to include in a surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensor array for the analysis of organic vapors is described. The method combines an extended disjoint principal components regression (EDPCR) pattern recognition analysis with Monte Carlo simulations of sensor responses to rank the various possible coating selections and to estimate the ability of the sensor array to identify any set of vapor analytes. A data base consisting of the calibrated responses of 10 polymer-coated SAW sensors to each of six organic solvent vapors from three chemical classes was generated to demonstrate the method. Responses to the individual vapors were linear over the concentration ranges examined, and coatings were stable over several months of operation. Responses to binary mixtures were additive functions of the individual component responses, even for vapors capable of strong hydrogen bonding. The EDPCR-Monte Carlo method was used to select the four-sensor array that provided the least error in identifying the six vapors, whether present individually or in binary mixtures. The predicted rate of vapor identification (87%) was experimentally verified, and the vapor concentrations were estimated within 10% of experimental values in most cases. The majority of errors in identification occurred when an individual vapor could not be differentiated from a mixture of the same vapor with a much lower concentration of a second component. The selection of optimal coating sets for several ternary vapor mixtures is also examined. Results demonstrate the capabilities of polymer-coated SAW sensor arrays for analyzing of solvent vapor mixtures and the advantages of the EDPCR-Monte Carlo method for predicting and optimizing performance.

Acoustics↗
PubMed1995

Active acoustic screening: reduction of noise in gradient coils by Lorentz force balancing.

We have designed and constructed a quiet gradient set with restricted access for the combined purposes of evaluating the principles of active acoustic screening, recently introduced by Mansfield, Glover, and Bowtell, and for EPI studies of the head at 3.0 T. The design utilizes the return paths of the conductors in a closed arc loop arrangement to eliminate net Lorentz forces thereby attenuating acoustic noise especially at low frequency. This design should significantly reduce the dangers to patients of high noise levels, especially in high field magnetic resonance imaging systems.

Acoustics↗
PubMed1995

Steering by echolocation: a paradigm of ecological acoustics.

1. Flights of three big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) landing on a hand and catching a suspended mealworm were video analysed. 2. Results were consistent with the bats using the same basic control procedure in the quite different approach tasks--namely keeping tau (r) = kr and tau (a)/tau (r) = k alpha r. Here r is the current distance to the destination; alpha is the angle between the current direction of the destination and the goal direction of final approach (beta min); tau (r) = r/r, tau (alpha) = alpha/alpha; and kr, k alpha r are constants. 3. The bats were each quite consistent on a particular task (hand or mealworm) in the values they used for the control parameters kr, k alpha r and beta min. However, different values were used in the two tasks, which reflected the different behaviour required at the destination. Flights to hand required twisting and landing upside down and approach angle beta min was closer to vertical and kr was smaller and corresponded to decelerating nearly to a stop. In contrast, the mealworms were caught in mid flight and approach angle beta min was shallower and speed of approach was about constant. 4. tau (r) might be registered acoustically by tau (echo-delay) or by tau (echo-intensity). tau (alpha) might be registered by the bat's directional hearing and gravity sense. 5. The bat's learned the tasks easily, suggesting that the control procedure they used in the experiments was part and parcel of the natural skills they had developed in the wild.

Acoustics↗