Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7129875

A new fallout prediction model.

Abstract

The standard method for the calculation of nuclear weapon fallout radiation doses and dose rates in operational type studies for the last 20 yr has been the computer algorithm known as WSEG-10. WSEG-10 uses empirical functions rather than numerical analyses and computes fallout dose (rates) in seconds or less on modern computers. WSEG-10 has long been criticized for its inability to allow for variations in the activity-particle size distribution of the fallout, for its inability to account for fractionation and for the absence of realistic settling rates. At the other end of the scale, the Defense Land Fallout Information Code, DELFIC, is currently used for research work and as a comparison standard. DELFIC produces fallout footprints on the ground by numerical integration, employing discrete cells in space, time and particle size. A new fallout prediction method is presented here which, unlike WSEG-10, does allow variations in activity with particle size, does account for fractionation and does model variable settling rates. This new model, like WSEG-10 but unlike DELFIC, computes in seconds or less. Some results are presented and compared to DELFIC and to WSEG results. Additionally, this new model will treat the far-field problem of interest in a massive strategic attack which cannot be easily done using DELFIC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Bridgman, W S Bigelow. 1982. A new fallout prediction model.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198208000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Whole body MRI--diagnostic strategy of the future?].

Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) opens new opportunities in diagnostic radiology as systemic disease entities can be examined with high sensitivity. This can lead to a change of paradigm, so that not only organ-related but rather disease-specific MRI examination protocols can be applied which focus on the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Whole body MRI has already been successfully used for several oncological and non-oncological indications. In addition, whole body MRI has broadened the discussion regarding its use for secondary prevention. Compared to computed tomography, MRI does not use radiation. Although whole body MRI is still in an early stage, the enormous medical and economical potential can be envisioned.

Forecasting↗