Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7125076

Synchronous bilateral neck dissection.

Abstract

The type of treatment used to control evident or possible metastatic cancer in the cervical region remains in dispute. When clinically positive lymph nodes are present in both sides of the neck, treatment to both sides is mandatory. If surgery is elected as the primary treatment, the neck dissection can be done bilaterally, either in one or two stages. Synchronous bilateral radical neck dissection has been associated with a high morbidity rate. It was the purpose of this paper to report the indications, complications, and results in a series of 179 synchronous bilateral neck dissections done between 1967 and 1979. In all except one instance, the internal jugular vein was saved on one or both sides. The mortality rate was 3.4 percent. Patients with histologically positive lymph nodes that were present bilaterally were found to have a reasonable prospect for cure. The rate of recurrence was related more to the inability to control the primary cancer than to treatment failure in the neck.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J Ballantyne, G L Jackson. 1982. Synchronous bilateral neck dissection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(82)90421-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma in the stomach: an unexpected presentation of MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Carcinoma